Front Page

Content

Authors

Game Index

Forums

Site Tools

Submissions

About

You May Also Like...

AL
Andi Lennon
August 12, 2020
W
We-reNotWizards
August 11, 2020
MT
Matt Thrower
August 09, 2020

Play Matt: Petrichor Review

Board Game Reviews
O
oliverkinne
August 07, 2020
AL
Andi Lennon
August 06, 2020
O
oliverkinne
August 06, 2020

Swatch Board Game Review

Board Game Reviews
W
We-reNotWizards
August 05, 2020
W
We-reNotWizards
July 29, 2020
AL
Andi Lennon
July 29, 2020
T
thegiantbrain
July 28, 2020

Kemet - Review

Board Game Reviews
O
oliverkinne
July 27, 2020
MT
Matt Thrower
July 26, 2020

Play Matt: Miremarsh Review

Board Game Reviews
MB
Michael Barnes
July 23, 2020
O
oliverkinne
July 17, 2020
MB
Michael Barnes
July 16, 2020
AL
Andi Lennon
July 15, 2020

No Dice Rolling on this River: Egizia Shifting Sands Board Game Review

W Updated March 25, 2020
 
3.5
 
0.0 (0)
2996 0
No Dice Rolling on this River - Egizia: Shifting Sands Board Game Review
There Will Be Games

Updating a board game can be tricky work. Tinker too much and you can put off the purist fans of the initial release but, if you don’t fix the perceived bumps in the road, it might not bring in new players. The updated version of Egizia called Egizia:Shifting Sands, it is still about building those world famous monuments on the banks of the Nile and it still includes that powerful “One Way”(Down the Nile) worker placement.

It also still has those little rules twists that can be initially confusing. When building a monument, you need both the proper amount of a.) Stone and b.) Worker Strength. But you can only use one base worker at a time when working on a monument and you can’t combine base workers together to achieve that strength...but you can combine a base work and a “leader/purple” worker. And while there is a limit of one base worker per “monument” there are usually two monuments you can work on per “dock” space. (The Colonnade and the obelisk in one area and the Statues and the Pyramid in another). So, you can see where it could be perplexing.

The one dock that has a single monument is The Sphinx. Going to the Sphinx let’s you pull a number of bonus cards (that offer VP bonuses for achieving goals in-game) equal to the stone/strength you spend (up to a specific limit that depends on the number of players) and then keep one. That may seem overly powerful,which is probably why it has been moved to the last position on the Nile. Don’t get me wrong, you do want to hit this up a number of times during the game but the luck of the draw still plays a part and the more stone you spend to midgate that luck lessens your return.
2ps

There is also the “prospecting” rule where you can place a ship beside a location if it is already “full.” This stops other players from simply clogging up a port to stop you from building on a monument. So, there is no “hate shipping” on the Nile, even if another player claims a spot, if they don’t actually use it, you can slip in.

All of your workers also require that they be fed once per round (bloody peasants!), so food is the other key resource in the game. Come up short on food for your workers and you suffer a loss of Victory Points...and try not to think about what happens to the actual workers.

It is weird that a game that is so cutthroat includes a “cooperation” bonus for building on multiple monuments in a single turn. When I say it is cutthroat, I’m talking about things like the weather ring. It can be set for harvest of only green fields, green and yellow fields and Green Yellow and Red fields. (Otherwise known as Some, Most or All). In theory, there is no reason to move it once it hits the GYR setting, is there? Everyone secures some food and it is a time of plenty...unless you want to be an ass and deprive other players of Grain and possibly cause them to lose some VP. The game seems particularly vicious with a two-player count since every “take that” is directed at the other player whereas other player counts sort of spread the “That” around.

The “There is always one less space available than the number of players” on the monument positions means you can expect friction between the players at any count. It is a friction that I, personally, enjoy. But you might get a ”Why you gotta be so rude, don’t you know I’m a slave driving monument builder too?” from the other players.
2p2

The decisions in Egizia are interesting, the “One Way Only/Downstream” nature of the Nile when placing your ships makes the choice of jumping further down the river to grab a location you really want tempting. But, since you are not allowed to place a ship on any position above where your latest ship was placed, it also makes it a gamble. There is also a mechanism that allows for “escalating” cards (seperate cards for round one/two three/four and round five) that increase the stakes/rewards at the game progress.

In all, it is an enjoyable, friction-heavy game that excels when you have three or more players. It is a good mixture of planning, strategy, and luck...with luck playing enough of a part that you’ll probably end up debating which was more important when you lose.

A review copy of this release was provided by the publisher.

Photos

No Dice Rolling on this River - Egizia: Shifting Sands Board Game Review
No Dice Rolling on this River - Egizia: Shifting Sands Board Game Review

Editor reviews

1 reviews

Rating 
 
3.5
Egizia: Shifting Sands
In all, it is an enjoyable, friction-heavy game that excels when you have three or more players. It is a good mixture of planning, strategy, and luck...with luck playing enough of a part that you’ll probably end up debating which was more important when you lose.
Wade Monnig  (He/Him)
Staff Board Game Reviewer

In west Saint Louis born and raised
Playing video games is where I spent most of my days
Strafing, Dashing, Adventuring and Looting
Writing reviews between all the Shooting
When a couple of guys reminded me what was so good
About playing games with cardboard and Wood,
Collecting Victory Points and those Miniatures with Flair
It’s not as easy as you think to rhyme with Bel Air.

Wade is the former editor in chief for Silicon Magazine and former senior editor for Gamearefun.com. He currently enjoys his games in the non-video variety, where the odds of a 14 year old questioning the legitimacy of your bloodline is drastically reduced.

“I’ll stop playing as Black when they invent a darker color.”

Articles by Wade

Wade Monnig
Staff Board Game Reviewer

Articles by Wade

User reviews

There are no user reviews for this listing.
Already have an account? or Create an account
Log in to comment

Jackwraith's Avatar
Jackwraith replied the topic: #308571 25 Mar 2020 12:10
Have never played Egizia. Is it anything like Imhotep (if you've ever played that)? They sound similar, although Egizia sounds more "directly vicious", I guess, which is entertaining for those of us who like to trade blows within our building plans, as you mention.

We picked up a copy of Imhotep around the time of its release from an FLGS, played it a couple times, and then put it on the shelf. I looked at it the other day on BGG and there are like a half-dozen expansions for it. I had no idea it was that popular.
Sagrilarus's Avatar
Sagrilarus replied the topic: #308592 25 Mar 2020 22:15
I'm curious about the title, which seems to have no footing in anything other than rhyming with someone's name.
WadeMonnig's Avatar
WadeMonnig replied the topic: #308594 25 Mar 2020 23:30

Sagrilarus wrote: I'm curious about the title, which seems to have no footing in anything other than rhyming with someone's name.

I think they were going for Egizia meaning "Of Egypt." Or maybe you are right and it was Egizia: (in small print NOT A GAME BY) Reiner Knizia.