Front Page

Content

Authors

Game Index

Forums

Site Tools

Submissions

About

You May Also Like...

O
oliverkinne
December 14, 2023
Hot

Mycelia Board Game Review

Board Game Reviews
O
oliverkinne
December 07, 2023
Hot

River Wild Board Game Review

Board Game Reviews
O
oliverkinne
November 30, 2023
Hot
J
Jackwraith
November 29, 2023
Hot
O
oliverkinne
October 09, 2023
Hot
O
oliverkinne
October 06, 2023
Hot

Outback Crossing Review

Board Game Reviews
O
oliverkinne
October 05, 2023
Hot
O
oliverkinne
October 02, 2023
Hot

Forests of Pangaia Review

Board Game Reviews
O
oliverkinne
September 29, 2023
Hot

Bagh Chal Review

Board Game Reviews
AL
Andi Lennon
September 28, 2023
Hot
O
oliverkinne
September 25, 2023

Castle Panic Review

Board Game Reviews
GS
Gary Sax
June 21, 2023
Hot
O
oliverkinne
June 09, 2023
Hot
O
oliverkinne
June 02, 2023
Hot

Ahoy Board Game Review

Board Game Reviews
O
oliverkinne
May 26, 2023
Hot

Village Rails Review

Board Game Reviews
O
oliverkinne
May 19, 2023
Hot

The Spill Board Game Review

Board Game Reviews

Pan Am Flies High - Review

Hot
MB Updated August 10, 2020
 
5.0
 
0.0 (0)
11182 0
Pan Am Board Game

Game Information

Game Name
Publisher
Players
2 - 4
There Will Be Games

Prospero Hall delivers their best work yet in this Funko-published masterpiece.

One of the most brilliant things about Sid Sackson’s Acquire is how it models corporate mergers and acquisitions. What eventually happens over the course of the game is that one company gets larger and larger and eventually starts devouring the smaller businesses on the board. Shareholders in the consumed businesses get an option to trade in their shares for the defunct company for shares in the juggernaut that ate them – essentially pledging fealty to their new corporate masters.

But I’m not here to review Acquire- in short, one of the greatest games ever published. I’m here to have a look at Pan Am, a new Prospero Hall design that is one of the best business games I have played in recent memory. It’s a stunning piece of work, a highly refined and studied design that may very well be the closest a mass market, mainstream title will ever get to 18xx or even something like Power Grid. Yet conceptually, its gameplay feels wholly accessible, with easy to grasp ideas and goals. It’s also beautiful to look at, centering its visuals around the classic blue and white Pan Am logo and an overall midcentury modern aesthetic that captures the “Golden Age of Air Travel” idea and presents information in a clean, clear, style.

It is very much a game about the history of Pan Am, the most innovative and influential airline in the history of the industry, and I think it is just absolutely brilliant how the company is depicted. This is where that Acquire reference comes into play. Each player represents the head of a small regional air line, working to secure routes, airports, and a fleet of planes. But then, when Pan Am gets going from its original headquarters in Miami, they start eating up the smaller routes. Over the course of the 40 years the game covers, the smaller airlines are absorbed by the corporation and the players who sell out to them get paid. They then take this money to either pay for the operating costs for bidding on acquiring routes, airports, and a fleet in the worker placement-driven Engineer phase or they can buy stock in Pan Am, which fluctuates based on a price set by an event card each turn.

The winner isn’t the player with the most money. It’s the player with the most shares in Pan Am. That little airline you run doesn’t amount to anything in the end. You want to sell out. You want the die roll that drives Pan Am’s expansion to draw their attention to your routes. You want to be incorporated, to be absorbed into the rapacious capitalism, to turn your private ownership into public ownership.

I’m not sure if Prospero Hall intended to make a game with the real-deal Pan Am license that has a specific message about corporate business and capitalism, but maybe they did? Maybe the history of Pan Am, sprawling out across the globe like a virus in Pandemic, is used here to show how corporations expand, consume, and assimilate competition? Maybe there is a message here about

It’s all navel-gazing, really, because beyond the subtexts (if there really are any), this is a tremendously fun, competitive and easy to play game. The Event Phase gives you a little historical headline, a real-world event that may impact your plans for the round. In the Engineer Phase, you bid your engineers and a few on-board tracks to claim destination cards and build airports, which you have to have to grow your airline. You’ve also got to use these to acquire bigger and better planes, which are needed for the longer haul flights. Or you might put one of your Engineers on the Directives track to claim an action card. Then, the resolution phase has you executing these actions and creating a tangible sense of infrastructural narrative. And the Pan Am phase hits, and you want to see that roll come up on one of your lines, like you’ve baited this monster to come and eat you up.

The bids on the tracks can skyrocket quickly – the spaces are limited and with a full table of four the auction action is hot. The race to take Destination cards can find you on the back heel, overbidding or winding up without what you need to secure landing rights for a route you want. Or you might be outbid on acquiring one of the lovely little plastic planes you need to claim a route at a crucial moment. This is definitely not a passive-aggressive game of staring at player mats and wondering how to maximize efficiencies. It’s about opportunities, outspending the other folks, and earning enough money to have the best chances of being acquired and get the big payouts...so that you can finish a shareholder rather than a proprietor.

I absolutely love this game and in terms of raw design, this is the best thing that Prospero Hall has produced to date. It’s an instant classic, a very modern game that also manages to feel like a vintage design from 20, 30, or maybe even 40 years ago. You get a sense that the designer or designers (since we really don’t know) understand what it means to be influenced by and informed by previous mechanisms and concepts without emulating or duplicating them, instead evolving and expanding them. Even as much as I’ve enjoyed watching this company come out with great game after great game for the past year or so, this one really took me by surprise. Even after the genius of Villainous and Jaws, I just did not expect such a great, sophisticated economic game to come from this group. Without a doubt, this is the best game of 2020 at least here at the halfway point.


Editor reviews

1 reviews

Rating 
 
5.0
A brilliant, accessible business game that may or may not be a sly commentary on corporate capitalism.
MB
Top 10 Reviewer 137 reviews
Michael Barnes (He/Him)
Senior Board Game Reviews Editor

Sometime in the early 1980s, MichaelBarnes’ parents thought it would be a good idea to buy him a board game to keep him busy with some friends during one of those high-pressure, “free” timeshare vacations. It turned out to be a terrible idea, because the game was TSR’s Dungeon! - and the rest, as they say, is history. Michael has been involved with writing professionally about games since 2002, when he busked for store credit writing for Boulder Games’ newsletter. He has written for a number of international hobby gaming periodicals and popular Web sites. From 2004-2008, he was the co-owner of Atlanta Game Factory, a brick-and-mortar retail store. He is currently the co-founder of FortressAT.com and Nohighscores.com as well as the Editor-in-Chief of Miniature Market’s Review Corner feature. He is married with two childen and when he’s not playing some kind of game he enjoys stockpiling trivial information about music, comics and film.

Articles by Michael

Michael Barnes
Senior Board Game Reviews Editor

Articles by Michael

User reviews

There are no user reviews for this listing.
Already have an account? or Create an account
Log in to comment

Sagrilarus's Avatar
Sagrilarus replied the topic: #311631 02 Jul 2020 19:16
Presumably Pan Am is at its peak at the end of the game? It had a pretty ugly fall from grace in its later years.

Getting mentioned in the same breath with Acquire is high praise (I'm trying to avoid altitude double-entendres and having a devil of a time) and Acquire's rules are dead simple. It could sell to a wider audience. Regarding complexity, where would you put Pan Am?
Michael Barnes's Avatar
Michael Barnes replied the topic: #311632 02 Jul 2020 20:33
Oh yeah, everything after the zenith is politely ignored!

Rules complexity is pretty light, especially for a hobby crowd. For a mainstream audience, it’s somewhat more complex than TTR, but I the think the concepts are concrete and well-explained enough that it can play broad. There is one slightly over-complicated bit- securing landing rights means either having airports or pairs of cards keyed to destination or region. It’s kind of a “check the rulebook” thing for the first game.

The rulebook is really, really good though.
drewcula's Avatar
drewcula replied the topic: #311639 03 Jul 2020 08:29
Thanks for the write up. I saw this on the shelves while grabbing my copy of JotL. It looks fab.

Still, my prediction: MB will be selling this before the winter holidays.
ubarose's Avatar
ubarose replied the topic: #311648 03 Jul 2020 12:08
Back in December they said that they were working on a game inspired by Power Grid. I think this may be it.
Vysetron's Avatar
Vysetron replied the topic: #311685 04 Jul 2020 17:06
This game's the real deal. One thing it manages to accomplish that really impressed me is how it avoids dumping math onto the players. A lot of economic games force you to calculate a lot, but Pan Am never overwhelms with numbers. It's incredibly well designed in that regard.
Cranberries's Avatar
Cranberries replied the topic: #311947 12 Jul 2020 14:39
Only $34 at Target. Now I have to decide between this and repurchasing a cheap first edition of Pax Pamir.
WadeMonnig's Avatar
WadeMonnig replied the topic: #335122 20 Aug 2022 13:30
I'm in the initial throes of love with this
Game. Give me a two year later follow up
Michael (and everyone else).
Michael Barnes's Avatar
Michael Barnes replied the topic: #335124 20 Aug 2022 14:55
Sill own it, still play it. Still love it. Still their best game.
SuperflyPete's Avatar
SuperflyPete replied the topic: #335176 22 Aug 2022 12:14
I bought it for David Ausloos and had no interest. Shipping became stupid so he reneged and I kept it.

Turns out that it’s absolutely incredible. I’m at least 8-10 games in at this point and it’s still super fun, super interesting, and worthy of a top 5 of the decade for
Light Euroey Games
RobertB's Avatar
RobertB replied the topic: #335189 22 Aug 2022 15:59
Pan Am is the real deal. Luck can bite you a little bit, but if you work around it you can still win. I've never played it with 2, but it plays fine with 3 and 4.
jpat's Avatar
jpat replied the topic: #335223 24 Aug 2022 10:12
2p is ok, but of course it's better at 4.
jeb's Avatar
jeb replied the topic: #335226 24 Aug 2022 11:38
Just joining the chorus. It's my #1 recommendation for a Game You Can Get At Target. Has a cool map, nice components, lots of fun gamey bits. Has auctions that don't feel like screwjobs, planning, some RNG. Just a really solid title.