Front Page

Content

Authors

Game Index

Forums

Site Tools

Submissions

About

You May Also Like...

W
WadeMonnig
April 22, 2026
W
WadeMonnig
April 16, 2026
W
WadeMonnig
April 13, 2026
W
WadeMonnig
April 08, 2026
W
WadeMonnig
April 03, 2026
W
WadeMonnig
April 01, 2026
W
WadeMonnig
March 30, 2026
W
WadeMonnig
March 27, 2026
W
WadeMonnig
March 23, 2026
W
WadeMonnig
March 20, 2026
W
WadeMonnig
March 16, 2026
W
WadeMonnig
March 13, 2026
W
WadeMonnig
March 09, 2026
W
WadeMonnig
March 06, 2026
W
WadeMonnig
March 02, 2026
W
WadeMonnig
February 27, 2026

Malicious Enjoyment: A No Thanks Card Game Review

W Updated April 06, 2026
 
4.5
 
0.0 (0)
1329 1
Malicious Enjoyment: A No Thanks Card Game Review

Game Information

Game Name
Publisher
Players
3 - 7
There Will Be Games

While you may have heard of some of the Magenta Line games before CMYK released them, No Thanks is probably the most well known. No Thanks was created by German Game Designer and Electrical Engineer Thorsten Gimmler. I like to think he could also add “Noted Linguist” to his resume. Growing tired of explaining what “Schadenfreude” was to his non-German speaking friends, he decided to create a real life definition in Card Game form.

The deck in No Thanks has cards number from 3 to 35 (with one copy of every number). Each card is worth the number of points printed on the card and points are bad, m'kay. On your turn, you can either take the card that has been revealed and place it in front of you as your points OR you can put one of your (limited) No Thanks tokens on it and avoid picking it up and sending it to the next player who then has to make the same decision.

no thanks

If a player creates a “run” of cards in front of themselves (Like if they have the 10, 9 and 8 cards) then their point total is only the lowest card in that run (eight in that case). Cool, right? Except that, when the deck is assembled at the beginning of the game, nine cards are removed. So, there will be gaps in point reduction when using runs...and you won't know where they are. It is hilarious to me that after playing a time or two, players will inevitably bemoan the fact that those nine cards are removed and wonder aloud if the game would be better if those all stayed in...it wouldn't, but I love how everyone seems to jump to that conclusion.

Green Cards

CMYK and the Magenta line gives No Thanks that light purplish red treatment, so all of the No Thanks tokens have a bit of personality. I say a bit of personality because they all are basically saying “ThankyouverymuchbutIwillpass" with a face that would make Mr. Yuk proud. It also have a distinct green on silver aesthetic for the cards that makes the game pop on the table but it can be a bit overwhelming.

One of the joys of No Thanks is taking a moderately high card, say a 18 and then immediately revealing a 17 (when you take a card, you reveal the next card and decide if you want to take it as well). You want that card because it will reduce your point total by one but, usually, no one else wants that card. So, you decide if you want to send that sucker around the table to pick up some No Thanks tokens from the other players (which will restock your supply of tokens and be negative points if you still have them at the end of the game). And, after you pull this move off once, you think “Maybe I can send that sucker around....one...more...time...and secure another batch of tokens!” But, inevitably, this will end up backfiring on you because you didn't realize that another player is actually out of tokens and will be forced to pick up the card....screwing over your plan and likely thier plan, because you got a little too greedy. It's all part of the fun/pain of No Thanks.

All Stuff

I once had a game where, between making a run of lower point cards and having a batch of tokens left at the end of the game, that I ended up with zero points...and I'm not saying this to brag...much..but I'm expressing that if I'm still telling the “zero points” story years after it happened, this game of feeling good about another player feeling bad is pretty damn impressive.

So, tune up your linguistic talents so that you can No Thanks is as many ways as possible during a game. A 24? ¡No Gracias! A 22? No Grazie. A 35! No Merci! Of course, No Merci! tickles my double entendre funny bone and is my personal favorite. (Neck and neck with “Fuck right off.”) If there is such a thing as a “Classic Feel Bad Filler” No Thanks is that game.

 

A review copy of this release was provided by the publisher. Therewillbe.games would like to thank them for their support.

If you enjoyed this review, please consider tipping via My KOFI. All proceeds go to buying more games for review!

Photos

Malicious Enjoyment: A No Thanks Card Game Review
Malicious Enjoyment: A No Thanks Card Game Review
Malicious Enjoyment: A No Thanks Card Game Review

Editor reviews

1 reviews

Rating 
 
4.5
No Thanks
So, tune up your linguistic talents so that you can No Thanks is as many ways as possible during a game. A 24? ¡No Gracias! A 22? No Grazie. A 35! No Merci! Of course, No Merci! tickles my double entendre funny bone and is my personal favorite. (Neck and neck with “Fuck right off.”) If there is such a thing as a “Classic Feel Bad Filler” No Thanks is that game.

Wade Monnig  (He/Him)
Staff Board Game Reviewer

In west Saint Louis born and raised
Playing video games is where I spent most of my days
Strafing, Dashing, Adventuring and Looting
Writing reviews between all the Shooting
When a couple of guys reminded me what was so good
About playing games with cardboard and Wood,
Collecting Victory Points and those Miniatures with Flair
It’s not as easy as you think to rhyme with Bel Air.

Wade is the former editor in chief for Silicon Magazine and former senior editor for Gamearefun.com. He currently enjoys his games in the non-video variety, where the odds of a 14 year old questioning the legitimacy of your bloodline is drastically reduced.

“I’ll stop playing as Black when they invent a darker color.”

Articles by Wade

Wade Monnig
Staff Board Game Reviewer

Articles by Wade

User reviews

There are no user reviews for this listing.
Already have an account? or Create an account
Log in to comment

Jackwraith's Avatar
Jackwraith replied the topic: #344996 06 Apr 2026 20:15
Excellent. This is one of those games that probably makes the rest of the line worth it, regardless of how good those are. I agree with some of the respondents on Reddit, questioning why anyone would want to play with a more "subdued" version of a game like this. Why wouldn't you want to play this kind of push your luck/gotcha with as garish a palette as possible? That seems like part of the fun.
hotseatgames's Avatar
hotseatgames replied the topic: #344997 07 Apr 2026 09:38
I've never played this, but it seems like the kind of thing I'd like.
WadeMonnig's Avatar
WadeMonnig replied the topic: #344998 07 Apr 2026 10:22

hotseatgames wrote: I've never played this, but it seems like the kind of thing I'd like.

We'll have to set up a FATties game on board game arena!
hotseatgames's Avatar
hotseatgames replied the topic: #344999 07 Apr 2026 14:30
It's a deal. I've never used that site but I made an account, so feel free to add me. hotseatgames
Sagrilarus's Avatar
Sagrilarus replied the topic: #345000 08 Apr 2026 21:00
therewillbe.games/articles-up-your-game/...ty-of-favored-ground

I remembered that I had chimed in on this one, too. A remarkably interesting game considering how simple it is, because of the one curious added rule that makes some cards more valuable (or in this case valueless) to one than they are to others. Really an interesting little play.
WadeMonnig's Avatar
WadeMonnig replied the topic: #345001 09 Apr 2026 16:34

Sagrilarus wrote: therewillbe.games/articles-up-your-game/...ty-of-favored-ground

I remembered that I had chimed in on this one, too. A remarkably interesting game considering how simple it is, because of the one curious added rule that makes some cards more valuable (or in this case valueless) to one than they are to others. Really an interesting little play.

Swing by BGA and we'll all play a game