Front Page

Content

Authors

Game Index

Forums

Site Tools

Submissions

About

You May Also Like...

O
oliverkinne
November 23, 2021
O
oliverkinne
November 16, 2021
O
oliverkinne
November 02, 2021
O
oliverkinne
October 26, 2021
O
oliverkinne
October 26, 2021
O
oliverkinne
October 18, 2021
O
oliverkinne
October 12, 2021
O
oliverkinne
October 05, 2021
O
oliverkinne
September 28, 2021
O
oliverkinne
September 14, 2021

Play and Pass

Essays
O
oliverkinne
September 07, 2021

Paring down

Essays
O
oliverkinne
August 24, 2021
O
oliverkinne
August 17, 2021
O
oliverkinne
August 10, 2021
O
oliverkinne
August 03, 2021

Clickbait Doesn't Work

O Updated
(Photo by Anne Nygård on Unsplash)
There Will Be Games

Maybe you're reading this now, because you saw the title of the article and wondered what it meant. Maybe you clicked on the link, because you disagree with my statement about the effectiveness of clickbait and have come here to put me right. Maybe you've come here because you do agree with me and want to back me up. Whatever the reasons, in this article, I want to talk about the effectiveness of using clickbait titles to get views.

You've probably seen them before. Links on a web page that entice you to click them: "Don't miss this opportunity to make money quick!" - "You will never believe what they did next." - "Change your life forever with these simple tips."

I must admit, I've clicked on them myself before and even a big organisation like the BBC has started using them on their website. So they clearly worked on me and generally, they are seen as a great way of attracting people to your website and keeping them there.

At the same time, we've become accustomed to them and many of us probably no longer click on the obvious ones any longer. I certainly don't fall for the "You won't believe your eyes" type of links anymore and there are many others that are clearly not giving you any useful information and are merely there to entertain you and get you to go onto their website.

So click baiters have now upped their game. Gone are the days of more innocent headlines or link text. Now it's all about courting with controversy or creating controversy where there is none. As we all know too well, politicians have gone down that same route. Using controversial headlines and soundbites to get a reaction is now a very popular tool.

I'm not a psychologist, but as far as I can tell, the reason why a video with the title "Boardgame Playthroughs Are Awful" is successful in getting clicks is that it forces people to take sides. The title isn't moderate or positive, but negative and accusing. I would even go as far as saying that the title is actually quite offensive to a lot of people. The title intentionally provokes a reaction and that reaction can only be one of two options: you agree or you disagree. It creates division.

Some people will click on the title because they agree with the statement and want to support it in the video's comments. Others click on the title because they disagree, and probably strongly disagree, and want to make their disagreement known. Of course, every comment on that video will spur a reply, either that of further agreement or disagreement. You have two opposing sides of an argument as your captive audience and the discussion will easily go on for days, because people are now polarized and both sides want to win the argument. Chances are, the discussion becomes more and more heated.

So if the intent of a clickbait title, of using words that try and create controversy, is to get lots of attention, then using inflammatory headlines such as "Boardgame Playthroughs Are Awful" works. Your video views will go up, every time someone comments or replies. Your marketing goal has been reached and of course, now that your video has so many views, your next video will also use a clickbait title. It's a one-way street really.

The real question is though, whether being sensationalist or inflammatory and whether using controversy and division to get lots of views is the right goal to have.

I certainly don't think it is. I think it's great to start a discussion, but it needs to be a proper discussion, not a shouting match. It's important to create an environment where everyone feels like their voice can be heard, which is already hard enough given the world we live in and our current social norms. Using an inflammatory title that forces you to take a side certainly doesn't encourage people to listen to others and take their comments on board. It doesn't put you into the headspace where you're open to hearing what others have to say and reflect on whether your opinion needs adjusting or even changing completely.

Rephrase your headline into something that asks for discussion and openness to hear other people's views. Say something like: "Let's Look At Boardgame Playthroughs Again."

If you don't want to start a discussion about an issue, but you have your own opinion on why something doesn't work, at least why it doesn't work for you, then come up with better options and offer suggestions. It's always easy to criticise. It's easy to call something "terrible" or "awful". It's a lot harder to suggest how something could be done better, even with the benefit of hindsight sometimes.

So if you think you know how things could be improved, then your headline could read: "My Suggestions To Make Boardgame Playthroughs Better." Now it's up to you to say what doesn't work and why, but not only that, you also have to explain how it can be improved. That would be really useful to people.

In fact, I do often think that articles, podcasts or videos that help us improve in some area and that offer useful suggestions and tips, will get more views and clicks than the clickbait titles that we see so often - even the controversial ones.

Courting with controversy with the goal of getting lots of clicks is a terrible approach and not something I condone. In fact, I suggest you vote with your feet and unfollow, unsubscribe or otherwise stop giving those click baiters your support. I stopped clicking on the "You won't believe your eyes" links and I unfollow those who use sensationalist headlines to get more views. We need to make this world a better place and stop giving those people our valuable time who just create more hate and division.

There Will Be Games
Oliver Kinne
Oliver Kinne (He/Him)
Associate Writer

Oliver Kinne aims to publish two new articles every week on his blog, Tabletop Games Blog, and also release both in podcast form. He reviews board games and writes about tabletop games related topics.

Oliver is also the co-host of the Tabletop Inquisition podcast, which releases a new episode every three to four weeks and tackles different issues facing board games, the people who play them and maybe their industry.

Articles by Oliver Kinne

Log in to comment

hotseatgames's Avatar
hotseatgames replied the topic: #327810 09 Nov 2021 08:53
Proposing an alternate title....
10 Reasons Clickbait doesn't work... Reason 6 will SHOCK you!
jason10mm's Avatar
jason10mm replied the topic: #327811 09 Nov 2021 09:00
5 comments about your article, number five will BLOW YOUR MIND!

I agree completely. A headline as a catchy way of informing the reader of the articles content is one thing, but being deliberately misleading, inflammatory, or confrontational is another beast entirely.

Yet here we are. In the era of instant news and the rush to break the story, even if it is just a single line "Explosion reported, thousands COULD be dead!?" this kind of thing is inevitable. No one buys the whole paper anymore, they just pick what catches their eye and a flashy headline is just that.

I suppose the fault starts with the editor, since they choose or approve the headline. Gone are the days of copysetters trying to fit in words on a fixed sheet of newsprint (although you guys seem to have a pretty consistent font size on the top row so maybe their are some limits on what a headline can be). Anyhoo, the editor should set the tone for the publication, haven't seen evidence that they exist in years, replaced by autocorrect I suppose.

Youtube is even worse, since now you have an video to pair with the headline, and are heavily incentivized to hit specific time hacks and engagement levels before you get relegated to the deep dark depths of "last weeks news".

This is why a close community has value. Even if I disagree with folks on some issues, there is a level of consistency here that lets me weigh reviews and play experiences against my own preferences to a pretty high degree of accuracy.

It's when a reviewer is clearly just spouting ad copy back at us that the integrity and trust are lost, and are hard to regain.
charlest's Avatar
charlest replied the topic: #327813 09 Nov 2021 09:17
Don't shoot the writers - at the major outlets, from my experience the editor is the one crafting the headline 90% of the time.
Vysetron's Avatar
Vysetron replied the topic: #327815 09 Nov 2021 10:07
Yeah, I've had some titles get mutilated for clickbait purposes on pieces I've done for other sites. Not a fan. That said, a lot of folks do choose to go that route.
Frohike's Avatar
Frohike replied the topic: #327889 11 Nov 2021 20:32
Because it works...