<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Board Game Reviews - There Will Be Games]]></title>
		<description><![CDATA[Board Game Reviews, Articles, News, Podcasts and Forums since 2007.]]></description>
		<link>https://therewillbe.games/</link>
										<item>
								<title><![CDATA[Churchill Review: ]]></title>
				<link>https://therewillbe.games/articles-main-menu/boardgame-reviews/board-game-reviews/discussions/review?id=1620</link>
				<category><![CDATA[Board Game Reviews]]></category>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://therewillbe.games/articles-main-menu/boardgame-reviews/board-game-reviews/discussions/review?id=1620</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[
				<img src="https://therewillbe.games/media/reviews/photos/original/8d/d2/70/churchill-review-36-1448493185.jpg"  alt='Churchill Review'  title='Churchill Review'  class='jrMediaPhoto'  align='left'  loading='lazy'  width='150'  height='150'  />				<div>There's a absolutely brilliant game in this box. But it requires a lot more time and effort to tease out than most gamers are willing to give it. The scoring rules, although not long, are incomprehensible at first and it takes several plays to understand how to win. And it needs three exactly to play and to play together repeatedly to get to grips with the strategy. If you want one game, for three, for years, get Churchill. If you want variety, don't.</div>				]]></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2019 03:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
			</item>
						</channel>
</rss>