Front Page

Content

Authors

Game Index

Forums

Site Tools

Submissions

About

Latest Blogs...

S
shami
March 31, 2021
S
Sagrilarus
March 09, 2021

It's on the Wall

Member Blogs
EA
engineer Al
February 19, 2021
A
alan72
December 10, 2020
T
thegiantbrain
November 12, 2020

Bouldering

Staff Blogs
TK
The King in Yellow
July 11, 2020
M
max
July 10, 2020
J
Jexik
July 06, 2020
Hot
J
Jexik
July 02, 2020
Hot
O
oliverkinne
April 27, 2020
Hot
J
Jexik
April 06, 2020
Hot
S
sindhubaby
March 26, 2020

Dungeons and Dragons a therapeutic tool?

Designer and Publisher Blogs

Now Playing: Microgames

Hot
MT Updated
There Will Be Games

loveletterAmongst my international journalism whoring, I contribute occasionally to the magazine Casual Game Revolution.

They recently asked me to contribute an article on "microgames", small short games that seem to have beome popular in the wake of Love Letter. The finished piece includes a short interview with the designer of that game, Seiji Kanai, as well as coverage of Love Letter, Agent Hunter and Romans Go Home, so you might want to hunt down the upcoming issue if you're interested.

After playing a number of small games for the piece - no arduous task since they're often ten to twenty minute games including teaching and setup - I was struck by the fact that although they're very diverse, they have a number of mechanical similarities. Namely, there are usually strong elements of luck, bluff and memory.

One of the most notable characteristics of Love Letter itself is that it strikes a superb balance between these three things: indeed I’m pretty sure that’s what makes it so much fun and why it’s become so popular. But what’s notable about bluff and memory is that they’re things that require skill and effort on the part of the player but virtually no rules overhead to put into a game. And of course putting in a decent slab of luck is a streamlined way of injecting some tension and uncertainty.

You want much in the way of spatial strategy or resource management then you’ve got to put in mechanics to deal with that, and components too. Older “microgames”, like the metagaming series, look positively bulky compared to their modern counterparts, but it’s hardly surprising given the way games generally have slimmed down over the intervening years.

What I’m not sure about is whether this micro-trinity of luck, bluff and memory is enough to make the genre more than a flash in the pan. It can only support so many games before it starts to wear thin. Much as I’d like to have more short, satisfying, portable games around I’m not sure there’s really going to be anything long term that can beat a deck of playing cards.

There Will Be Games
Matt Thrower (He/Him)
Head Writer

Matt has been writing about tabletop games professional since 2012, blogging since 2006 and playing them since he could talk.

image

Articles by Matt

Log in to comment