A lot of insults and a little bit about the old Warrior Knights

Southernman wrote:

quozl wrote:

Yeah, some idiot threatening to shoot my brother does stick with me for some reason and then when I ask a gaming question on another site, the same idiot decides to hound me about it some more. Yeah, I think that sticks with me.

Are you really this stupid that you think what you're doing is acceptable?

You're not in Kansas now Dorothy.

Yeah, but holy shit, can't you guys take this to PM? Not that I care, but I'm not really in the dick-measuring mood.

I'd rather not get PMs from a psycho. Does this site have an ignore feature? I'll gladly use it.

quozl wrote:

I'd rather not get PMs from a psycho. Does this site have an ignore feature? I'll gladly use it.

Uh...that's the beauty of our site. We're not supposed to need one.




Back on topic--sorry, I haven't played WK. Always struck me as redundant if I had Game of Thrones, though Skeletor thinks otherwise. Uba described it as a "trashier Game of Thrones", with less tight play and more luck.

I'd gladly play it if someone else owned a copy, new or old.

Ken B. wrote:

Southernman wrote:

quozl wrote:

Yeah, some idiot threatening to shoot my brother does stick with me for some reason and then when I ask a gaming question on another site, the same idiot decides to hound me about it some more. Yeah, I think that sticks with me.

Are you really this stupid that you think what you're doing is acceptable?

You're not in Kansas now Dorothy.

Yeah, but holy shit, can't you guys take this to PM? Not that I care, but I'm not really in the dick-measuring mood.

Sorry - this is one of the side-affects of having an 'open' site where whining narking cunts are allowed to post instead of being sent back to T.O.S in a body bag.

Yeah, if you let Southernman post crap like this, how can you restrict anything?

quozl wrote:

Yeah, if you let Southernman post crap like this, how can you restrict anything?

We don't. Never banned users or deleted content (save once on the old blog, a mistake I won't likely make again.)

We've just always done the trick with peer pressure. You know, the ol' "you're being a dick, dude!" type deals.

I sure hope that works.

quozl wrote:

I sure hope that works.

Actually the forums do have rules, contrary to what some apparently believe.

The golden rule is don't bore Mr Skeletor - if I'm being entertained I'll let things fly. On the other hand if I'm finding your bullshit annoying me I have no qualms about taking action. And yes, the non-WK sections of this thread are fucking boring me.

I do have an idea for how to settle disputes between 2 people, but to date I have never had to use it. If I'm home tonight I may put the framework in place, along with the trade forum Ken's bugging me for.

Mr Skeletor wrote:

quozl wrote:

I sure hope that works.

Actually the forums do have rules, contrary to what some apparently believe.

The golden rule is don't bore Mr Skeletor - if I'm being entertained I'll let things fly. On the other hand if I'm finding your bullshit annoying me I have no qualms about taking action. And yes, the non-WK sections of this thread are fucking boring me.

I do have an idea for how to settle disputes between 2 people, but to date I have never had to use it. If I'm home tonight I may put the framework in place, along with the trade forum Ken's bugging me for.

Yeah, I'll defer to Frank on this because the forums are his baby.

Thanks Frank!

quozl wrote:

I'd rather not get PMs from a psycho. Does this site have an ignore feature? I'll gladly use it.

The ignore feature is to not respond -- you know, the old fashioned way of ignoring. As my mom would always say when fighting with my brother, while sending me into an instant rage, "It takes two to tango"

But then I'd be letting the terrorists win!

quozl wrote:

But then I'd be letting the terrorists win!

the point is that regardless of who wins, you both lose for being silly.

It's like invading a country which has nothing to do with terrorism, on framed charges of WMDs and pissing off all your allies and public opinion in the process, then fucking up the administration so badly it turns into a civil war. Fine, so you manage to take out some terrorists, but everybody still thinks you're an asshole, even though they were sympathetic to your arguments at an earlier point.

your luck is, that you are not up for reelection

Mr Skeletor wrote:

I do have an idea for how to settle disputes between 2 people, but to date I have never had to use it. If I'm home tonight I may put the framework in place, along with the trade forum Ken's bugging me for.

What's wrong with: two men enter, one man leave? How do you improve on genius?

Jur wrote:

It's like...
your luck is, that you are not up for reelection

Apart from the fact that virtually everything in your post was wrong, your final analogy fails spectacularly, since he WAS re-elected.