Bugs: Recent Topics Paging, Uploading Images & Preview (11 Dec 2020)
Recent Topics paging, uploading images and preview bugs require a patch which has not yet been released.
Let's Discuss Nations (and other civ games)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Personal opinion is that even in a two player game, confrontation is not the only legit strategy.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Posts: 1728
- Thank you received: 771
To move to clash discussion on a bit. What is a good opening strategy? I bought a 2nd settler on the first turn this time. this was clearly a mistake. It put me behind on research and gave me 3 cities and i couldn't defend them. This is definitely a game where you build up in the first half and put your plans into action in the 2nd. What are the best routes to building up?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
We've had a couple games where Barbarians really beat up on one player early, and in both games both players claimed they were now "out of the game." Both times they came back and were very competitive at the end due to other players not viewing them as much of a threat in their early weakened state.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- san il defanso
-
- Offline
- D10
-
- ENDUT! HOCH HECH!
- Posts: 4623
- Thank you received: 3560
To move to clash discussion on a bit. What is a good opening strategy? I bought a 2nd settler on the first turn this time. this was clearly a mistake. It put me behind on research and gave me 3 cities and i couldn't defend them. This is definitely a game where you build up in the first half and put your plans into action in the 2nd. What are the best routes to building up?
You should totally post this as its own thread. That's a game that totally deserves its own strategy discussion.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
I won't pretend to give any comments on the full game and interaction, but I think there is a notable thing that Nations does well---something which could have gone disastrously wrong and landed it on my trade away list.
At the end of the game, there is a VP salad count for the winner. But my sense from the 3 times I soloed it is that the amount of VP you get and the things that you get them from are not just something that drop out of the sky at the end, but tangible, real, progress you have built up over the whole game. That is to say that the VP score you get from the count em' up ending felt very consistent with how I organically felt I was performing during the game. In fact, a significant number of the points are awarded *during* the game itself for outperforming others *during* the game. There's a sense of urgency, you'll probably lose if your plan only comes together in the last turn. If there is one thing that drives me nuts about (bad) worker placement games it's when you count at the end and it produces a result that is not consistent with your own relative assessment of how each player is playing. I think Nations doesn't have this problem, which is excellent design.
The other bit is an issue many have commented on. The game is super tactical due to the tableau options. I'm fine with it. The hardest thing about this tactical nature is that you'll never have it all. Your empire is always going to be good at one or two things, but you're never going to feel very safe in a couple of other areas. The way buildings work (only producing two types of resource) and how expensive they are to staff and buy from the tableau means you'll never really have more than 1 or 2 cutting edge buildings. If you staff those, which you should, you're going to be pretty inefficient at whatever those buildings don't produce. It's pretty tense. So this last solo game I managed to grab two good buildings for production of money and ore. But I was always, always right on the edge of famine every turn and it meant I couldn't get a very large population, which really hindered me.
Finally, printing out the production tracks is a must. I did it at Kinkos or whatever today. It's criminal they aren't in the box, to be honest. I was an idiot and printed them on A4, so they were tiny, but they're a godsend.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Whatever FUCKING moron didn't put a +/- resources track in the original box is a complete dolt. I've never had as significant a swing from "man, this is fucking cumbersome to play" to "This works great" with the addition of a single component. Really? You don't see how having between 12-22 "+/-X" values for 4 different resources might require a consistent tracker to make plans with? Do not play this game without a tracker.
I think the only part of this game that I don't like is the VPs you earn from staffing buildings---and they are substantial. Riffing off my last post, it is the only part of the VP salad ending that *doesn't* work because it sets up a bullshit "end of the world" situation where you stare at the board very carefully and maximize which buildings your dudes are on. Everything else about the scoring works great, though, so I'll forgive it.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.