- Posts: 3456
- Thank you received: 1303
Bugs: Recent Topics Paging, Uploading Images & Preview (11 Dec 2020)
Recent Topics paging, uploading images and preview bugs require a patch which has not yet been released.
Please consider adding your quick impressions and your rating to the game entry in our Board Game Directory after you post your thoughts so others can find them!
Please start new threads in the appropriate category for mini-session reports, discussions of specific games or other discussion starting posts.
What BOARD GAME(s) have you been playing?
- Space Ghost
- Offline
- D10
- fastkmeans
Erik Twice wrote:
From what I've gathered, he did find the original system to be flawed but considers that every time he has tried to improve on it, he has gone two steps forward and one step back. For example, he consider the Netrunner economy to be better but also "too complex". I disagree, of course.Space Ghost wrote: I agree with this. I think that one potential mistake is to assume that Garfield is trying other designs in an attempt to "fix" Magic. He might just be trying other stuff out. Evolution of game design principles doesn't necessarily imply improvement -- just difference, exploring the potential design space.
I think it is hard to get everything perfect in one game (for what it's worth, I don't think that Magic is perfect, by any means).
As far as other CCGs, I really enjoyed INWO (but I like the whole realm of conspiracy theories) and, I know this will cause many people to discount anything I have to say in the future, but I liked Spellfire -- the main key being that it really didn't shine until 4 or 5 sets in; which many people didn't give it that long.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Black Barney
- Offline
- D20
- 10k Club
- Posts: 10045
- Thank you received: 3553
Erik Twice wrote: A friend of mine got a knife pulled on him over a Magic-related issue and it was only the tip of the iceberg. I remember having to watch my opponent like a hawk, because cheating was widespread. People would stall in every single game, they would abuse the judge system to take longer and generally act like asshole. And better watch your decks because theft is rampant. People are dicks even in Magic Arena and that's a place where you have 5 phrases to choose from.
By far the worst community I've been part of.
Yes, Magic has been the worst gaming community i've ever had the misfortune of having access to.
The best, from my experience, was the Lord of the Rings: TCG community back in the day. Everyone was super chill, there was practically zero cheating going on. Very social, very adult. I loved it.
Now I'm experiencing the various gaming communities in video games over the years and there is quite the diversity there too. Halo players seem to be the WORST. Gears of War players were my favourite (super collaborative and encouraging, a huge amount of African-Americans too who are awesome to play with). Call of Duty isn't bad, it's pretty funny, but I don't join lobbies anymore, i'm always in parties with friends when I play.
btw, I'm surprised Shellie hasn't blown a gasket that we haven't spun off this huge CCG conversation into another thread
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Not meaning to disrupt the conversation, just dropping in what I've been up to in this past week's gaming.
At home:
A busy week so fairly quiet on the gaming front, however we did squeeze in a couple of rounds of Sentinels of the Multiverse. Yeah, yeah, I know that the love affair on here was very brief, we still like it though and the belated arrival of the final expansion has reinvigorated it. There are a total of eleven new heroes and five environments so plenty to try out, although I have no interest in the scenario included in the box which apparently takes several hours to play.
When I read what people are up to on the publisher’s forums I am astonished at some of the crazy combos that people have found and still have no idea how to actually make them work in my own games. What I like about this new wave is that the hero decks are maybe the most transparent of the entire run, in that the cross-deck combos are easy to figure out and to trigger. It reminds me of the very first box where it was fairly obvious how the different characters work together and support one another, the expansion characters often being a lot more obtuse.
Although there isn’t much love for the game on this site I think that it remains an astonishing bit of design work to have nearly a hundred decks that all have a unique theme and playstyle with plenty of interaction between the decks. The graphic design still looks like crap though, they kind of tied themselves into a poor style and couldn’t get out of it, but even with a proper full-time designer now on staff they still manage to do questionably stupid stuff like putting dark text on a dark background. Given how nice some of their other games look it’s a shame that they backed away from the tough choice of revising the usability of their banner product partway through its run.
At the club:
Kicked off the evening with classic filler For Sale, in which I started brightly in pacing my bids such that I was either getting the second card for only two or three coins or snatching cards for free when the spread was close. So I was buoyant for the second round but ran afoul of some impatient card reveals in one of the property auctions that resulted in me chucking in a card that I hadn’t yet settled on; It was the one that happened to be in my hand at the time and I didn’t want to be a dick having seen the other bids revealed so just chucked it in, which turned out to be a really awful play as I massively overpaid on a low value cheque with only weak cards left for the final couple of rounds. I couldn’t recover and so my game went from wonderful to woesome in a blink and I ended up a solid last.
Tavarua, oh yes we donned our wetsuits and hopped up on some fibreglass once again. The mean edge of this game is certainly being exploited by our group; from what I gather this wasn’t really the design intent as snaking waves is considered poor form in the sport and only an optional rule in the game. However it does something wonderful from a gameplay perspective as it’s no longer just about striving for the best possible run, the game also very much becomes one where you are trying to spoil your competitors attempts and leave them stranded while you ride away on ‘their’ wave. It also makes those superior scores even more exhilarating when you achieve them as you have not only had a high-scoring run, you have also kept all the other assholes at bay whilst doing it. Loving this game a lot, it’s a dead cert for one of my favourites of the year.
Everdell was up next and only the second time I’ve played this, interest being put on hiatus after the first attempt was banjaxed with some AP dithering and rules misinterpretations. I like it well enough, it feels a lot like a Trewicek-style tableau builder where you operate on what seems to be impossibly tight resources but if you have your wits about you then you can chain cards together to leverage their abilities and extend your turn out much longer than seems likely at first glance.
I have a confession to make in that I have an innate affinity with these kinds of games. My group refuse to play Imperial Settlers or 51st State with me because I will still be playing each round for several minutes after they have all passed, stomping to the kind of scores that mean they are really only playing for second place. It’s no exception here where I’m still in Winter when the other players are jumping into Summer, and reluctantly stepping into Spring while they are on the edge of Autumn. What I really like about Everdell though is that the fixed tableau size and individually-timed rounds restricts the ability of players like me from running away with the game. Timing becomes crucial as not having workers on hand means that you cannot jump into vacated spaces when someone changes their season, which inevitably means that you miss out on some of the plum ones altogether. Having a late and long Summer means that the other players get into the best scoring spaces while you are still locked out from them and they also have more workers available for grabbing the bonus-scoring events at a time when you are still using yours to scratch and dig for resources.
As you will eventually run out of space in your city there is no incentive to stay in any given season for too long other than to maximise the bonus that you earn in Spring and Autumn, which makes for very tough and interesting decisions on when to make your move. So although the other guys were astonished at how long I was able to drag out my seasons it was hugely problematic for me to do so and I had to keep cutting my plays shorter than they could have been in order to remain competitive with workers. I like that very much about this game.
What I don’t like so much though is the long list of “this must have been a kickstarter then” problems. The teeny tiny card text, the stupid badly designed tree, the easily-missed poor choice of differentiating between single-use and repeatable action spaces, the barely perceptible ‘open’ action symbols, the suspiciously imbalanced cards that you can drop into your tableau for free if they fall into your hands in just the right order. Oh it’s so close to being great, but there is no way I would reach over 51st State to play this and there is always Root to turn to for cutesy anthropomorphic critters in a complex game. I do hope there is a revised edition of this one day.
A lightening of the mood with Too Many Cinderellas, a lovely silly game that comes and goes from our table. For some reason I just couldn’t stop winning on this particular occasion even when it looked like I didn’t have a chance, so even with a pile of half a dozen diamonds in front of me we had to keep going until someone else finally managed to get engaged. No game of this is complete without getting the myopic prince to marry the bloke in a dress, and success was duly achieved.
Catch the Moon to see the night out, I was stuck with an ass to the right of me who kept piling ladders into the same teetering spot and no matter what I did I managed to knock something over each time. We had a pretty interesting structure on the go with a central ladder jammed in good and steady which then allowed for a blossoming hourglass style shape to start taking form, so we just kept going after the moon-tears were all gone even pressing the fallen ladders back into action.
Dragonmeet tomorrow, my favourite convention, so hopefully some fun things to report!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Erik Twice
- Offline
- D8
- Needs explosions
- Posts: 2300
- Thank you received: 2650
Venture Angels: This is a bad, bad game. You have 4 or 5 poker chips with values on them and the idea is to make blind bids on cards that give Victory points. TThere are some rules about overfunding resulting in the VP tile going away and so on but it's nothing special. What is special is that this game has one of the worst "catch-up" mechanisms I've ever seen. Basically, whoever wins has to play his bids face-up. If you win twice, you play with all your bids face-up. And wheover loses gets another poker chip. Apparently they decided that not only this 10 minutes game needed a catch-up mechanism but they also decided that the catch-up should defeat the entire point of the game.
Play Colossal Arena instead.
Chicago Express: Introduced this game to two new players and I felt a bit uncomfortable because they let me have shares for very cheap early on and I snowballed from there. I tried not to abuse it, it was a learning game, but it was hard when I had 3 more shares than the other players and twice the money.
Cosmic Encounter: Great game where everyone was an expert. Interestingly, while Observer sucks he has one of the highest winning ratios so far with 2 our of 3 games won.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Having a lot of fun with the game.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Tigris & Euphrates continues to be amazing. I've played it maybe 4 times in the past month and keep liking it more and more. Yellow and Yangtze has some good points, like having hexes for tiles and giving each leader a power. But the original game is still my favorite thanks to the aggressive push towards the treasures and the decision of making a monument or keeping your kingdom strong.
Kemet is still awesome too. Have had a couple plays recently and while everyone struggles with the tech tiles the game itself is good. I picked up the latest expansion, Seth, and really want to try it 2v1. More games need to be optimal at 3 players.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Gotta say the game was fine as a one off, but the branching campaign stuff is really fun and elevates it to another level entirely. We picked up the character packs during the Black Friday sale, and we're definitely looking forward to running through another campaign and seeing what other nonsense we can get into (and messing with the new skills and whatnot).
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Erik Twice wrote:
Chicago Express: Introduced this game to two new players and I felt a bit uncomfortable because they let me have shares for very cheap early on and I snowballed from there. I tried not to abuse it, it was a learning game, but it was hard when I had 3 more shares than the other players and twice the money.
Chicago Express is one of my all time favourites, but it’s one of the most fragile and unintuitive games I own. It’s fallen out of rotation over the last years; it takes a number of plays for new players to understand the implications of choices, beyond even games like 1846 or Imperial.
Meanwhile, Imperial offers many of the same types of decisions but new players seem to better grasp the effect on the outcome. It’s taken over for now, but I’m hoping it can lead to Chicago Express down the line. It’s nice to have a similar game that plays in less than half the time!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Legomancer
- Offline
- D10
- Dave Lartigue
- Posts: 2944
- Thank you received: 3873
QE
Bloc by Bloc
The Devil's Level
Fairy Tale
Welcome To
Junk Orbit
Terraforming Mars (Elysium, Venus, Prelude, Colonies)
Bloc by Bloc
Fairy Tale is funny because I was playing Paper Tales a few weeks ago and thought, "This is okay, but I'd rather play Fairy Tale." Then I remembered I no longer have Fairy Tale, as it got gone in a purge. So I re-bought it.
Bloc by Bloc - Here's what I wrote on BGG:
Being one who "glorifies insurgents and rioters" (in the words of one reviewer here) I was completely down with backing a boardgame that did the same. And I'm really pleased that I did. Bloc by Bloc is not just a great theme, handled to great effect (there are "ACAB" and "Our Streets" tokens!) but it's also quite fun and challenging. A top notch production in both game design and thematic implementation.
One thing to be careful of, however. The city is randomly generated, and though we didn't realize it at the time, the way the State tiles came out ended up handing us a very easy game. However, it was clear to see what the fix was and in the second play, while still randomly placing tiles, I tried to make sure it didn't happen again.
Glad I backed, rated an 8.
Terraforming Mars: Colonies - again, from BGG:
Terraforming Mars now has enough going on that we can start to evaluate expansions for themselves instead of "woo! new Terraforming Mars stuff!" And Colonies, I think, falls into the "lesser expansions" category, along with Venus Next.
There's nothing wrong with Colonies, it just adds stuff I don't think really needs to be there. No one is looking at TM and thinking, "Okay, but what if there were two more basic actions and other boards you had to pay attention to?" The added cruft just doesn't pay off. Throw in Venus Next, which the new Colonies cards play off of, and you can end up with a whole lot of action happening around Mars instead of to it, and a lot of mental overhead.
Thematically, it also bugs me. I want to Terraform Mars, and although there's mention of other things in the base game, it seems less of an achievement if Mars is just one of many already established locations producing things. Establishing a city on Mars kind of gets less special if you do it by bringing in supplies from the Pluto colony.
So far the base plus Prelude and either the base map or a Hellas/Elysium map are the winning combo for me. The other two feel like a "sometimes food" that I don't need most of the time.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
For example, in our game last night my son went heavy on trade and had a great loop with Callisto (I think – the Power-based moon) where he was trading on the cheap using discounted power and then using the moon to cycle more power back that he was converting into resources and VPs on his action cards. He had three trade fleets in play so just went hard and I was scratching what I could from them in his wake. On my side I went Floater crazy and was trading them off for all kinds of things, but the interesting point is that we both barely bought any of the cards that we drew. We could afford to be a lot more choosy about what we were taking which meant that we weren’t so reliant on the card draws to drive our capabilities, and yet we both had a very close and competitive game (it was a draw at 121pts if you’re interested, he took the tie-breaker).
I would agree that Prelude is definitely the best and most enjoyable of the expansions as it gives you a head start and assists in forming your long-term strategy, but Colonies is like pressing the accelerator on that. Interesting note though is that apparently the original design had all of this extra content already in it and was stripped down to make the game less complex and available to publish at a more accessible price point. If that is the case then I’m not surprised everything together just seems to fit better than using the expansions piecemeal, even though it does make the game considerably longer and more complex. I’m also kind of into the bigger story that it tells, the idea that in order to terraform Mars they need to leverage the resources of the moons and transport GHG from Venus, so it isn’t just about rocking up and planting trees. There’s kind of this big space opera going on in the background with corporations vying to exploit the solar system as a whole. I’d actually like to see more of that in a different game.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.