Front Page

Content

Authors

Game Index

Forums

Site Tools

Submissions

About

KK
Kevin Klemme
March 09, 2020
35142 2
Hot
KK
Kevin Klemme
January 27, 2020
20816 0
Hot
KK
Kevin Klemme
August 12, 2019
7404 0
Hot
O
oliverkinne
December 19, 2023
3965 0
Hot
O
oliverkinne
December 14, 2023
3491 0
Hot

Mycelia Board Game Review

Board Game Reviews
O
oliverkinne
December 12, 2023
2074 0
O
oliverkinne
December 07, 2023
2582 0

River Wild Board Game Review

Board Game Reviews
O
oliverkinne
December 05, 2023
2250 0
O
oliverkinne
November 30, 2023
2494 0
J
Jackwraith
November 29, 2023
3009 0
Hot
O
oliverkinne
November 28, 2023
1971 0
S
Spitfireixa
October 24, 2023
3692 0
Hot
O
oliverkinne
October 17, 2023
2619 0
O
oliverkinne
October 10, 2023
2461 0
O
oliverkinne
October 09, 2023
2289 0
O
oliverkinne
October 06, 2023
2505 0

Outback Crossing Review

Board Game Reviews
×
Bugs: Recent Topics Paging, Uploading Images & Preview (11 Dec 2020)

Recent Topics paging, uploading images and preview bugs require a patch which has not yet been released.

DC unveils Watchmen prequels...

More
02 Feb 2012 23:03 #115143 by Josh Look
...without Alan Moore's blessing but with Dave Gibbons.

Now before you draw up the torch bearing mob, take a look at the talent.

‘Rorschach’ (4 issues) – Writer: Brian Azzarello, Artist: Lee Bremen

‘Minutemen’(6 issues) – Writer/Artist: Darwyn Cooke

‘Comedian’ (6 issues) – Writer: Brian Azzarello, Artist: J.G. Jones

‘Dr. Manhattan’ (4 issues) – Writer: J. Michael Straczynski, Artist: Adam Hughes

‘Nite Owl’ (4 issues) – Writer: J. Michael Straczynski, Artists: Andy and Joe Kubert

‘Ozymandius’ (6 issues) – Writer: Len Wein, Artist: Jae Lee

‘Silk Spectre’ (4 issues) – Writer: Darwyn Cooke, Artist: Amanda Conner

‘Before Watchmen: Epilogue’ (1 issue) – Writer: Len Wein, Artist: John Higgins


By and large, that's some immense talent behind this project.

I'm the first one in line when it comes to tearing down the Watchmen movie. It sucked. I don't think that's a matter of opinion, I think it's fact and there's nothing subjective about it. It's shit, no two ways about it. Watchmen couldn't be translated faithfully to film, and the fact that it is faithful and still fails is proof. It did things that can only be done in comics and proved why there are aspects to the medium that are a better vehicle for storytelling than books and film. But I don't think I can lump these comics into the same boat as the absurd notion that it could work as a film. This is back to comics, where it belongs.

Despite whatever DC's intentions are here, which are most likely a cash-grab, the fact remains that a good story is just that...a good story. If these are any good, and the names attached to them would suggest that they will be, I don't think denying yourself a good, possibly great story is worth whatever feeble, pathetic protests many will put up over this (and really, what can you do? They're getting published, like it or not). They'll never be timeless masterpieces, but hey, I like to read good comics. Bottom line. If Batman ended where Bob Kane and Bill Finger left him and no one picked it up from there out of respect to them, we wouldn't be talking about Batman...we wouldn't have all those great stories and I think the world of comics and entertainment would be worse for it. I'm not saying Watchmen should stretch on in infinite directions, more that one should never say never.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
02 Feb 2012 23:36 #115151 by Michael Barnes
But here's the problem. Batman was written and intended to be a serialized character. Watchmen were not. They were written to exist in a very specific in media res environment, time, and cultural context.

Judging by the people on board for this barring Azzarello, (Jae Lee and Straczynski, really?), it's obvious that this isn't a very high-minded, literary project. This is toilet paper with the funnies printed on it.

The thing is, beyond what is in the Watchmen books as written by Alan Moore, I do not care what happened. Everything that you need to know about these characters is there, just like in a non-serial novel. There is no need for further backstory, prequel material, or rationalization for these characters. Other than to make money off the Watchmen brand.

Frankly, anyone who buys and reads these books for any other reason than morbid curiosity (which will likely sell a lot of books as it is) is either naive or completely ignorant and doesn't comprehend _why_ Watchmen is great. That likely means l'il Zack Snyder will have them on his pull list since he clearly didn't get the books.

Look, I'm a guy with a Rorschach tattoo on my forearm, alright? I love Watchmen. It's been an actual influence on my life and the way I percieve things. But I'll be damned if I ever buy another piece of Watchmen merchandise other than the Absolute Watchmen collection, which I already own.

I don't need or want more. I think most fans of this kind of property would agree.

Could they be good stories? Sure. But they're useless. If I want to read about Rorschach and the gang, I have that collection to go to. I can imagine the rest.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Fallen

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
02 Feb 2012 23:56 #115155 by Shellhead
I don't have a problem with DC doing this project, in terms of ethics or legality or basic business practices. Whatever the exact details of the legal arrangements between Alan Moore and DC, Moore is a smart guy who knew what he was getting into, or at least is smart enough to know that he should have gotten an agent and/or attorney to review whatever he was signing at the time.

That said, I'm not interested in these Watchmen prequels. The original was a very complete story, and I just don't see any legitimate room for prequels, sequels, or anything else to be tacked on. DC can print them, and a bunch of people will buy them, but I won't be one of them. There are so many other great comics that I still need to acquire or re-acquire, either as single issues or trades.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
03 Feb 2012 00:06 - 03 Feb 2012 00:18 #115156 by Josh Look
I get that Batman was meant to continue on beyond the work of his creators, but my point is that there are plenty of cases all throughout film and literature of an idea/character/whatever that is reinterpreted/continued beyond the original intent the creator, some which were designed to be self-contained, and it turns out to be fucking spectacular. FWIW, there's an interview someewhere with Moore from 1985, before Watchmen came out, where he says that if the book did well in the self-contained format, he and Gibbons had already talked about and had planned doing a prequel series. Hell, not only did he give a module for the DC Heroes RPG his blessing, he contributed new material to it. So apparently even Moore thinks there's more stories to tell here.

JMS is an odd choice to be sure. I like what I've read of his and I think his Amazing Spider-Man run is something to be applauded for the mere fact that he tried to do new things with the character and challenged you to think about him in new, interesting ways...and it's pretty heartbreaking that Joe Quesada had the whole thing un-done in the end. Hell, if anyone should be railing against the industry, it's JMS...but I digress. But really, you're writing off Darwin Cooke? Have you read The New Frontier? Seems like a perfect fit for the Minutemen if you ask me.

I think what makes it so easy to immediately dismiss these is that the original work is done by who it was done by...pretty much the ultimate genius when it comes to comics, and Watchmen happens to be his magnum opus. And yeah, this does seem _really_ disrespectful given his history with DC, no question there. That's the big thing going against these things, not so much that there isn't a need for more or that it was perfect on its own.
Last edit: 03 Feb 2012 00:18 by Josh Look.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
03 Feb 2012 00:09 - 03 Feb 2012 00:10 #115157 by dragonstout
Cool, this lets me cross anyone who shows any interest in these comics off my "I am interested in an ounce of what you have to say" list.

"Immense talent"? Are you KIDDING me? I like Darwyn Cooke sometimes. I like Azzarello sometimes. There are some good, not great artists. But there ain't "immense" talent. And do you think the characters are so much more important than the author of the book that you're willing to throw money at a company that's blatantly disrespecting the author's wishes?

Whatever the exact details of the legal arrangements between Alan Moore and DC, Moore is a smart guy who knew what he was getting into, or at least is smart enough to know that he should have gotten an agent and/or attorney to review whatever he was signing at the time.


False. His contract said that he would get the rights to Watchmen some number of years after the comics went out of print. This was in the age before graphic novels. He could have had no IDEA that they would keep Watchmen in print FOREVER so that he would never get the rights to it. Such a thing was completely unprecedented.
Last edit: 03 Feb 2012 00:10 by dragonstout.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
03 Feb 2012 00:17 - 03 Feb 2012 00:18 #115158 by dragonstout

Josh Look wrote: Hell, if anyone should be railing against the industry, it's JMS


Are

you

FUCK-

-ing

KIDDING me?

Yes. If ANYone has ever been screwed over in the comic book industry (I mean, when has that ever happened, right?), it's poor, poor J. Michael Strazynski. Because...his Spider-Man run is no longer "in continuity", or something?

Yeah, I'm pretty done with this thread.
Last edit: 03 Feb 2012 00:18 by dragonstout.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
03 Feb 2012 00:21 #115160 by Josh Look

dragonstout wrote:
Yes. If ANYone has ever been screwed over in the comic book industry (I mean, when has that ever happened, right?), it's poor, poor J. Michael Strazynski. Because...his Spider-Man run is no longer "in continuity", or something?


There's retcons all the time, but then there's FUCKING RETCONS. So yeah, I'd be pissed.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
03 Feb 2012 00:24 #115161 by Michael Barnes
One of the problems is that NO ONE can touch Alan Moore in terms of comics writing. Period. It's almost ridiculous. There is NO ONE that understands the _medium_ like he does or its potential for _literature_. Not even Frank Miller, Chris Claremont,Grant Morrison, Warren Ellis...none of them Sure, there's a lot of good comics writers out there but NO ONE has yet to write at the level that Alan Moore did in his best work. And Watchmen is his best work.

So ANYBODY writing this stuff, even decent workaday comics scribes like Azzarello and Cooke, is going to look small and insignificant. This is literally like penny dreadful writers contemporary with Melville attempting to write additional material for Moby Dick.

I think Moore thought Watchmen would come and go, regardless of what he put into it. It was SO radical and so unlike other comics, he probably thought it was a miracle that DC was going to publish it. But it was '86, and smart comics blew up that year. And now, it is probably the most widely read, respected, and influential graphic novel _ever written_.

That's the thing, Watchmen is a very, very rare thing. It's like The White Album or 2001. A creative work that occured at exactly the right time with exactly the right people involved. It's a flashpoint, and you can't recreate or extend that.

Unless you just want to monetize it, at which point you've lost the thread anyway.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
03 Feb 2012 00:40 - 03 Feb 2012 00:45 #115164 by Josh Look

Michael Barnes wrote: One of the problems is that NO ONE can touch Alan Moore in terms of comics writing. Period. It's almost ridiculous. There is NO ONE that understands the _medium_ like he does or its potential for _literature_. Not even Frank Miller, Chris Claremont,Grant Morrison, Warren Ellis...none of them Sure, there's a lot of good comics writers out there but NO ONE has yet to write at the level that Alan Moore did in his best work. And Watchmen is his best work.

So ANYBODY writing this stuff, even decent workaday comics scribes like Azzarello and Cooke, is going to look small and insignificant. This is literally like penny dreadful writers contemporary with Melville attempting to write additional material for Moby Dick.

I think Moore thought Watchmen would come and go, regardless of what he put into it. It was SO radical and so unlike other comics, he probably thought it was a miracle that DC was going to publish it. But it was '86, and smart comics blew up that year. And now, it is probably the most widely read, respected, and influential graphic novel _ever written_.

That's the thing, Watchmen is a very, very rare thing. It's like The White Album or 2001. A creative work that occured at exactly the right time with exactly the right people involved. It's a flashpoint, and you can't recreate or extend that.

Unless you just want to monetize it, at which point you've lost the thread anyway.


You're right on the money here, of course. I'm not debating any of that.

I'm not going to buy any of these. Not in single issue, not in trade. I _do_ think that the situation of DC's contract with Moore is fucking deplorable, and if anything, this should be downloaded and stolen for that. But am I going to read them? I'm not sure. I sincerely doubt that as inferior as they'll be, they'll taint the reputation of the original. Plus, say what you will, I like these writers. They're not Alan Moore, but like you say, who is? That's why I remain somewhat torn on the subject. I want to write them off and condemn them, I really do, but I tend to really enjoy Azarello and Cooke.

Shit, Barnes, you've reminded me that I _really_ need to read something by Alan Moore. Thanks for that. It's been a long damn time. I think the last thing I picked up of his was the first volume of Swamp Thing back when it go re-released in hardcover.
Last edit: 03 Feb 2012 00:45 by Josh Look.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
03 Feb 2012 00:48 #115166 by Jackwraith
Having spoken to Alan about this before (and Warren and Frank and countless others at various times; one of my favorite people to hang out with was Denys Cowan of Milestone fame), Watchmen was in the works for some time so he wasn't really surprised that DC published it. He WAS irritated that he had to do pastiches of the various Charlton characters that he wanted to use (publishing vetoed that because they didn't want to "taint" those characters in the same way some had felt that Swamp Thing has been "tainted" (to the tune of better sales than the book had ever had, before or since)) but later realized that it did give him a certain level of freedom that he might not otherwise have had. It would have been far more viscerally entertaining to make Peacemaker act like the Comedian, but he didn't have any burden attached to making the Comedian the Comedian. That's what led to a lot of the Minutemen backstory around that character.

To be honest, I think V for Vendetta is his finest work, purely on a story level, because it's not burdened with any of the superhero tropes that Watchmen is forced to engage. Of course, the fact that me makes most of those tropes work for his story is what makes Alan the writer that he is. There's simply a measured pace to V that is as obvious as the chapter titles, all of which start with the letter 'v' and all of which perfectly describe both the chapter and the next step in the process. It's a really a remarkable level of insight. Of course, if you ask Alan, he'll say that his finest work was Big Numbers. Everybody has their foci in life.

The prequels are a shame, but they're one that's been long in coming. You had to know that DC would never avoid the chance to make money off any cash cow. They probably figured that with an audience enlarged by the film and relatively ignorant of the context of the original story, what once would have been enormous blowback will now be muted. "He who controls the past controls the future. He who controls the present controls the past." and all that.

Funny thing is, for as good as V was for describing Thatcherite Britain and as good as Watchmen was at describing Reaganite America, the best rendition of current America is probably Warren's Transmetropolitan. Or it could just be that, in addition to running a comic studio, I've been involved in politics for so long that I can't see anything but the color jade.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
03 Feb 2012 01:06 - 03 Feb 2012 01:07 #115170 by Josh Look
I'm willing to call Watchmen his best work and that it deserves the place it's been given. But my favorite? The Killing Joke. It's the Bat-fanatic talking, there's nothing I've read that I _enjoy_ more by him than that.

Come to think of it, I'm more upset that The Killing Joke was retconned more than I am about the Watchmen prequels.
Last edit: 03 Feb 2012 01:07 by Josh Look.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
03 Feb 2012 01:24 - 03 Feb 2012 06:18 #115172 by OldHippy
I'd be curious to see what Cooke would bring to the table. He has a warmth that would suit the time and setting. Azzarello would suck, he's too heavy handed to get this stuff right.

Your right that the movie sucks, and it sucks partly because it's redundant in the worst kind of way, and partly because it was meant to be a comic.

It was also meant to be one comic, it was kind the of point. Backstory already included.

I have to agree Moore is the best writer by far but his comics frequently don't look like it and for visual tour de forces in my time only his books with O'Neil measure up. In that department Frank Miller kicks most peoples asses, if only he didn't get stuck in a time loop. I'd add too that Cerebus 2-4 is every bit as good and revolutionary for the medium as Watchmen. Sim might be a dickhead but he's fucking talented.

Moore has been matched before but no one is as versatile. The Black Dossier is phenomenal in terms of showing just how much he can do. Like it or not.

I'm not sure what I think about making new ones other than every writer who agreed to do this is de facto a hack now.
Last edit: 03 Feb 2012 06:18 by OldHippy.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
03 Feb 2012 01:27 #115173 by Mr Skeletor
Unappologetically loved the watchmen movie, no matter what "Facts" internet dweebs throw at me. This I couldn't give a fuck about, and is pretty much the reason I don't give a rats ass about comics.

When a tale is told a tale told. What's the point of bringing this shit back? If these storys are good why not use them with new characters?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
03 Feb 2012 06:05 #115182 by ThirstyMan
As far as good literature goes, it's pretty difficult to beat Neil Gaiman's Sandman grand story arc.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Dair

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
03 Feb 2012 14:26 #115195 by Juniper
Louis Vuitton is a prestigious and exclusive brand. Counterfeiters manufacture inferior-quality LV handbags. This impairs the value of the LV brand by making the product less exclusive, and by negatively affecting the perception that the LV mark denotes quality.

Watchmen is a brand that is recognized even by casual readers of comics. For many 'civilians' it is the only superhero comic that they will buy or read. Like LV, it is also a brand that denotes quality. There's a reason the book has never gone out of print (other than the desire to never see the rights revert to Alan Moore, I mean): people keep buying it. The population of dedicated comic book readers is too small to sustain continued sales like that. Watchmen is one of the few books you can recommend to your hip but relatively non-nerdy friends. Non-nerdy people buy it and buy it.

I'm sure that DC has been under constant pressure over the years to find new ways to monetize the equity that's in the Watchmen brand. Publishing new Watchmen material seems like a natural way to accomplish that. Unfortunately, it's also a really stupid idea, because:

1. it confuses the casual consumer who won't know which "Watchmen" book was recommended to them by well-meaning friends. "Do I need to read 'Before Watchmen' first," the civilian will wonder, "in order to understand Watchmen?" The prequels will be presented in a variety of styles, and will certainly be of at least slightly inferior quality to the original book. Will civilians who mistakenly read the prequels first get turned off, and then never read the real thing?
2. If the name Watchmen is no longer shorthand for "the very best in superhero comics," then DC will have squandered a lot of brand equity simply for the sake of promoting this year's turn-of-the-crank summer cross-over event.

The counterfeit handbags cause a lot of trouble for Louis Vuitton, but I don't think they're stupid enough to manufacture their own counterfeit product. "Before Watchmen" is a fake purse.

Setting aside the ethics of "Before Watchmen," it's a really stupid business move from an editorial team that has demonstrated its incompetence repeatedly. In the short run, they'll sell "Before Watchmen" in respectable numbers, but in the long run they'll discover that they shouldn't have messed with the goose that lays the golden eggs.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Mr Skeletor, Notahandle

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: Gary Sax
Time to create page: 0.210 seconds