Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me
  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2

TOPIC: The conundrum of co-operation

The conundrum of co-operation 07 Nov 2018 07:46 #285488

Hannibal: Rome vs Carthage provided one of the most memorable gaming sessions of my life. Since the mid game, my Carthaginian armies had dominated the board thanks to a blend of luck and skill. In the final turn, Rome's only hope was an instant victory by taking Carthage itself. He duly built a big invasion stack and in response, I drew forces back to protect Africa.

Read more...
  • MattDP
  • MattDP's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • Shiny Balls
  • Number Of Fence
  • Posts: 3388
  • Thank you received: 1219
Oftentimes defeat is splendid, victory may still be shame;
Luck is good, the prize is pleasant but the glory's in the game!
The administrator has disabled public write access.

The conundrum of co-operation 07 Nov 2018 08:08 #285489

I've been saying similar, albeit less eloquently, for a while now. Player interaction makes games interesting. Coops lose that. Why should I care about how this goes?

I DO like collaboration though. Competitive games that allow for alliances, negotiation, etc. are some of my favorites. It's way more interesting to choose when and how to cooperate than it is to just stare at a randomly generated puzzle with some other people around for an hour.
  • Vysetron
  • Vysetron's Avatar
  • NOW ONLINE
  • D4
  • Posts: 107
  • Thank you received: 145
The administrator has disabled public write access.

The conundrum of co-operation 07 Nov 2018 08:44 #285492

I was kind of shut out of co-ops for a while, since my groups have a similar attitude towards them. In the past couple years I've rediscovered the joy and fun of them. I think this article is missing the point that what a lot of people seek in co-ops are exactly what these "flaws" are. They don't want to compete against others. If you think being quarterbacked by an alpha player is annoying, what about being continually hammered by that player in a competitive game?

Co-ops offer a nice alternative. For me, they offer:

1) something other than "I got the most VPs" or whatever for victory. I find they have much more interesting settings and goals.

2) the ability to play games and BE quarterbacked. Our Pandemic Legacy group, also playing Time Stories and Robinson Crusoe, usually meets on Fridays. We're wiped on Friday. We want to drink wine and hang out and play a game and if I'm just not in the zone, I can still participate and I can still contribute and not be frustrated.

3) Welcoming to casual and non gamers. My wife is not a huge gamer, and is hesitant to play games with me because I do it more often and losing over and over just isn't any fun. But she looks forwards to the co-op sessions because that's not an issue, and because the games often stress things that competitive games don't.
  • Legomancer
  • Legomancer's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • D8
  • Posts: 2427
  • Thank you received: 2504
The administrator has disabled public write access.
The following user(s) said Thank You: ubarose, MattDP, southernman, Gary Sax, Frohike

The conundrum of co-operation 07 Nov 2018 11:18 #285504

What Legomancer said, especially point 1.
I grew up playing team sports so perhaps that's why I like playing a game as a team, why I just find them fun. Or perhaps the co-ops I have played happen to be fun because I've chosen them for theme and mechanics I like.
  • southernman
  • southernman's Avatar
  • NOW ONLINE
  • D10
  • TOTALLY WiReD
  • Posts: 3454
  • Thank you received: 674
Konieczkarian
F:ATies 'Spawn of Ameritrash' Worldwide Map: maps.google.com/maps/ms?ie=UTF8&hl=en&oe...7e41fde832d5ff51&z=2
The administrator has disabled public write access.

The conundrum of co-operation 07 Nov 2018 12:38 #285512

And yet, there are very few Team games, one team vs another.
  • Sagrilarus
  • Sagrilarus's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • D12
  • Posts: 6598
  • Thank you received: 3618
The administrator has disabled public write access.

The conundrum of co-operation 07 Nov 2018 12:47 #285515

Sagrilarus wrote:
And yet, there are very few Team games, one team vs another.

Two great ones from my collection: Guards of Atlantis and Captain Sonar.
  • hotseatgames
  • hotseatgames's Avatar
  • NOW ONLINE
  • D10
  • Posts: 4561
  • Thank you received: 2410
The administrator has disabled public write access.

The conundrum of co-operation 07 Nov 2018 13:53 #285521

Sagrilarus wrote:
And yet, there are very few Team games, one team vs another.

The team part I enjoy is the working together, doing your bit but then having someone else cover something you caan't. It's usually not about beating another team but winning as a team, so beating the game (well, a good game system) does the job.

Good point about Team games, the few I can think about are usually card or minis games with board game versions usually being 1 vs the rest - BSG being the only one I can think of (while typing) that does a sort of a team game. Perhaps someone can start a thread on it :-)
  • southernman
  • southernman's Avatar
  • NOW ONLINE
  • D10
  • TOTALLY WiReD
  • Posts: 3454
  • Thank you received: 674
Konieczkarian
F:ATies 'Spawn of Ameritrash' Worldwide Map: maps.google.com/maps/ms?ie=UTF8&hl=en&oe...7e41fde832d5ff51&z=2
The administrator has disabled public write access.

The Conundrum of Co-operation 07 Nov 2018 16:11 #285533

I have three main reasons why I play game: challenge, escapism, and social interaction. While there are people who love difficult coop, I'm not one of them. I'm in primarily for the experience. It just have to be interesting.
  • Sevej
  • Sevej's Avatar
  • NOW ONLINE
  • D8
  • Posts: 2110
  • Thank you received: 909
The administrator has disabled public write access.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Frohike, WadeMonnig

The conundrum of co-operation 07 Nov 2018 17:48 #285546

I said in a similar thread about co-ops, I've tried plenty of them in an effort to reduce butt-hurt with my teenage kids while playing games. With some rare exceptions, they simply haven't gone over like I had hoped. We've played Pandemic a dozen times and we have never lost. Do I think we are some sort of savants when it comes to saving the world? Nope, it just happens that the cards have lined up just spaced out enough that we have managed to secure a win each time. On that same note, I think we have tanked Forbidden Island the last 5 times we have played? Were we somehow not coordinating correctly? Nope, just happened to be the way the cards fell. Moreover, no one has really been like, This experience is amazing, we must do it again! It's been like, okay, those were fun, what else you got?
The co-ops that have worked are things like Seal Team Flix or Doctor Who: Time of the Daleks. We're all working together and, while there are more optimal moves that can be made, it never feels like it comes down to We drew badly or we drew well.
Something like Ghost Stories falls into the middle. It feels like that stacked on insane difficulty and called it a "challenge."
  • WadeMonnig
  • WadeMonnig's Avatar
  • NOW ONLINE
  • D6
  • Posts: 486
  • Thank you received: 258
The administrator has disabled public write access.

The Conundrum of Co-operation 07 Nov 2018 20:26 #285551

ANGOLA, the ultimate team wargame.
  • Msample
  • Msample's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • D8
  • Posts: 1856
  • Thank you received: 875
The administrator has disabled public write access.

The Conundrum of Co-operation 07 Nov 2018 21:55 #285556

The team game genre is hurt by a minimum player count. I’m not sure publishers want to make mid weight co-ops that require 4
  • SuperflyTNT
  • SuperflyTNT's Avatar
  • NOW ONLINE
  • Salty AF
  • SMH
  • Posts: 11108
  • Thank you received: 4740
youtube.com/watch?v=ZkHxIlNZTk4
The administrator has disabled public write access.

The conundrum of co-operation 08 Nov 2018 04:31 #285564

WadeMonnig wrote:
I said in a similar thread about co-ops, I've tried plenty of them in an effort to reduce butt-hurt with my teenage kids while playing games. With some rare exceptions, they simply haven't gone over like I had hoped. We've played Pandemic a dozen times and we have never lost. Do I think we are some sort of savants when it comes to saving the world? Nope, it just happens that the cards have lined up just spaced out enough that we have managed to secure a win each time. On that same note, I think we have tanked Forbidden Island the last 5 times we have played? Were we somehow not coordinating correctly? Nope, just happened to be the way the cards fell. Moreover, no one has really been like, This experience is amazing, we must do it again! It's been like, okay, those were fun, what else you got?
The co-ops that have worked are things like Seal Team Flix or Doctor Who: Time of the Daleks. We're all working together and, while there are more optimal moves that can be made, it never feels like it comes down to We drew badly or we drew well.
Something like Ghost Stories falls into the middle. It feels like that stacked on insane difficulty and called it a "challenge."

Co-ops that I really enjoy and that, mostly, have gone down well with my groups:
Lord of the Rings (I like it more playing Sauron in me vs them but only because theme jumps up another level)
Defenders of the Last Stand
Space Cadets: Away Missions
Eldritch Horror
Elder Sign
Arkahm Horror
Betrayal at House on the Hill
D&D: Castle Ravenloft
and its siblings
Gears of War
Secrets of the Lost Tomb


I do admit that I enjoy the themes that most of these games have so that likely improves my overall opinion and enjoyment of them.
  • southernman
  • southernman's Avatar
  • NOW ONLINE
  • D10
  • TOTALLY WiReD
  • Posts: 3454
  • Thank you received: 674
Konieczkarian
F:ATies 'Spawn of Ameritrash' Worldwide Map: maps.google.com/maps/ms?ie=UTF8&hl=en&oe...7e41fde832d5ff51&z=2
Last Edit: 08 Nov 2018 11:22 by southernman.
The administrator has disabled public write access.
The following user(s) said Thank You: ubarose

The conundrum of co-operation 08 Nov 2018 07:23 #285589

Vysetron wrote:
I've been saying similar, albeit less eloquently, for a while now. Player interaction makes games interesting. Coops lose that. Why should I care about how this goes?

I DO like collaboration though. Competitive games that allow for alliances, negotiation, etc. are some of my favorites. It's way more interesting to choose when and how to cooperate than it is to just stare at a randomly generated puzzle with some other people around for an hour.

Cooperation is definitely a form of interaction. People who dislike co-ops tend to come across as super-competitive fun murderers who consider entertainment to be a zero-sum proposition.
  • Shellhead
  • Shellhead's Avatar
  • NOW ONLINE
  • D20
  • Posts: 8087
  • Thank you received: 3736
The administrator has disabled public write access.
The following user(s) said Thank You: mads b., southernman, san il defanso

The conundrum of co-operation 08 Nov 2018 07:29 #285594

Academy Games has a great line of casual playing, team-based wargames with their 'Birth of...' line.
  • Mr. White
  • Mr. White's Avatar
  • OFFLINE
  • D12
  • Posts: 5622
  • Thank you received: 2568
Life & Death & An American Chainsaw
The administrator has disabled public write access.

The conundrum of co-operation 08 Nov 2018 07:40 #285608

Shellhead wrote:
Cooperation is definitely a form of interaction. People who dislike co-ops tend to come across as super-competitive fun murderers who consider entertainment to be a zero-sum proposition.

Well that's a hell of a characterization. Like I said I like working WITH people (team games, 1 vs alls, etc.), but I'm not as entertained at picking a fight with a deck of cards. Pandemic is boring.

Also there are a few exceptions to the rule. Darkness Comes Rattling, Burgle Bros, Ghost Stories, and Hanabi are all fun.
  • Vysetron
  • Vysetron's Avatar
  • NOW ONLINE
  • D4
  • Posts: 107
  • Thank you received: 145
The administrator has disabled public write access.
  • Page:
  • 1
  • 2
Time to create page: 0.373 seconds