Hearthstone: Control Paladin in Rastakhan's Rumble

Read more...

My problem with it, as I mentioned to you the other day, is that the recipe for Control Paladin is still burdened by six essential cards: 2x Wild Pyromancer, 2x Consecration, 2x Equality. You will basically never be able to play Control Paladin without these cards because they haven't introduced any options to replace them. Control decks in every other class have had options presented to them: Think Hellfire or Defile or Dreadlord for Warlock or any of 13 different board clears, plus Secrets, for Mage. Think about how Priest lost one of the best board clears ever made in Dragonfire Potion, but was presented with Duskbreaker and Psychic Scream, to go along with the old standby of Circle/Auchenai. I think they made an attempt for Paladin by introducing Shrink Ray, but it doesn't actually clear the board and a 9-cost combo is a lot more difficult to pull off than a 6-cost one.

Paladin is in this odd spot because its hero power makes it one of the best aggro classes in the game, as we can all see from the omnipresence of Odd Paladin and, prior to CtA's nerf, Even Paladin. You can't introduce awesome control elements to the aggro class because then they have the best of both worlds. It's the same problem they've had with introducing any other kind of archetype to Priest. You can see this problem with the healing angle they've tried to reinforce with Paladin. Zandalari Templar sounds like a cool card but, in practice, it really isn't. In order to get value from it, you have to wait until you've done something extraordinarily passive: heal yourself of 10 damage. Truesilver is only going to get you four of that, per sword, so you have to do something else or arrange your deck in such a way that healing is its focus (Djinn, Flash of Light, etc.) Until then, Zandalari is either a dead card in your hand or a vanilla 4/4 for 4 mana, which is awful. What that normally means is that you won't be playing your 4-mana 8/8 until turns 8, 9, or 10, where they're far less impactful, despite being cheap. Yes, on turn 10, you can do the Equality-Consec-Zandalari move and clear your opponent while dropping an 8/8. That's great. But it's also turn 10, where the likelihood that your opponent has something to deal with your single minion is quite high. If they'd made it even a 4/5 for 4 (i.e. Yeti stats), so that it wasn't simply an awful card sitting in your hand until you've taken multiple steps that don't help you win the game (e.g. the story of healing since the game's introduction), it might've been more worthwhile. Personally, I'd have argued for baseline Taunt that gets +4/+4 if you heal 10. That way, it would at least be a passable card to play in the early/mid game.

I still think that their design approach is too oriented toward "throwing shit at the wall and seeing what sticks." This was the approach that led to Odd/Even decks being introduced as a "cool thing" that then dominated the meta for months until the nerfs and are still pretty strong (Odd Paladin, as noted; it's dominating the legend ranks again.) I know that they're taking this approach to avoid having too many clearly mapped out decks for people to play, which means every deck is the same on ladder and people get bored. However, they're still bored in many cases because they're presented with these scattershot cards with no obvious application (Crystalsmith Kangor...), try new decks that don't work, and then go back to decks that do. And we end up back where we were eight months ago with Odd/Even decks steamrolling everything. Can't please all of the people all of the time and so on. /rant

Anyway, nice work. I am very off the game (obvsly) but I appreciate your insights.

Ubarose: YES. Blizzard makes good products. I hope they aren't dicks to artists. Anyone have tea?

I hear the complaints, the early game for Control Paladin is still Wild Pyro/Equality/Consecration. I just don't know how much this bothers me. Almost every Hero leverages Wild Pyro effects (Warrior/Mage just roll their own) in an Aggro metagame--you'd be crazy not to. Priest is far more reliant on Wild Pyro tricks than Auchenai + Circle over the last year at least. Auchenai is simply too slow, and competes with Duskrider at {4}. If anything, I'd say the anti-aggro metagame of HEARTHSTONE is more dominated by Stonehill Defender/Tar Creeper at {3}. Should we complain about the ubiquity of Lightning Storm?

The wrinkle this build adds is that where Pyro-Equality used to clear the board, now it can flip the board if you have Eggs scattered about. I've been using this in the Tavern Brawl and have cleared the opponents' boards and made three 8/8's with mana left over more than once. It's just in there.

The 4/4 on 4 isn't that bad. I see it like the Crackling Razormaw on 2 without a Beast. You'd rather have not, but sometimes you need to make a body. It puts Druid's 3/6's into Consecration range, for example. The issue with a full-throated commitment to Healadin is that you can end up with nothing to actually do except gain more life. I like the healing as a flank, and not main theme.

jeb wrote: The 4/4 on 4 isn't that bad. I see it like the Crackling Razormaw on 2 without a Beast. You'd rather have not, but sometimes you need to make a body.

Except that a 3/2 on 2 is still a good play: it can deal with 1/1s or opposing 3/2s, can provide pressure, is 5 stats for 2 mana, etc. The most Arena of Arena minions, Ogre Magi, gives you +1 Spell Power for being a 4/4 on 4. Cards that actually get played in constructed (or genuinely good Arena decks) have better stats or at least do something useful: draw you a card; give you another smaller body; drain life from your opponent; silence things; or have Taunt all on their own and a fatter ass so that they can't just get removed by... a Truesilver Champion.

Razormaw depends on a relatively simple condition to achieve its value (Have a beast. Hi, Springpaw!) Zandalari requires you to expend a considerable amount of resources to satisfy its condition; most of which are resources that don't enable you to win the game (healing) unless you're a mill deck or are so expensive that you'll never be able to play them before the cheaper cost of Zandalari becomes irrelevant. There's a reason that the majority of Paladin control decks in recent years DON'T play Lay on Hands, because it's too expensive for what it does and wastes your whole turn doing nothing that affects the board state (typically; unless you have something that can be benefited by 8 healing.) I'm fine with just playing a body to have a body, but most class minions are supposed to be better than the average joe you can pluck from the neutral ranks. I'm betting that, in the majority of games, you'll have rather had an Ogre Magi than a Zandalari, if only because the former does something (Consec for 3!), whereas the latter often won't.

I think Lay On Hands is coming back though. It was gone for a while, for sure, but the OP on Reddit says at least one copy is the heart and soul of modern Control Paladin builds. It's how you win against Control. You will lose without it on card advantage principles vs Control Warlock outdrawing you and Control/Odd Warrior out-valuing you. They even recommend keeping one on the draw if you know your opponent's decktype matches up. This isn't an OTK deck like the old Anyfin ones. It needs to make dudes (hopefully 8/8s) and beat on people. Fatigue isn't a path to victory, you need to push through with multiple attacks and sword hits. Barring that, you have occasional DK win, but that's not by design.

I have one Zandalari, and across 6 games it's been 4/4 twice and 8/8 twice. I wouldn't call it bad yet, but still trying it out.

OK. Where did you slot it into the Egg list? For that matter, given Paladin's historic glut at the 4, what "essential" card did you remove to fit it in?

Jackwraith wrote: OK. Where did you slot it into the Egg list? For that matter, given Paladin's historic glut at the 4, what "essential" card did you remove to fit it in?

Well, I built it assuming I'd see Aggro and Control, not a lot of mid-range stuff, and essentially no Silence. Why don't people run Silence? Anyway. Here's my build (I don't have Tarim):
1x Crystology
2x Equality
2x Hydrologist
2x Wild Pyromancer
1x Aldor Peacekeeper
2x Stonehill Defender
1x Time Out!
2x Consecrate
1x Meat Wagon
Lx Spiritsinger Umbra
2x Truesilver Champion
1x Zandalari Templar
2x Carnivorous Cube
2x Mechano-Egg
1x Shrink Ray
Lx Zilliax
1x Mossy Horror
1x Nerubian Unraveler
Lx Kangor's Endless Army
1x Lay On Hands
Lx The Lich King
Lx Uther of the Ebon Blade

So, it's "replacing" Tarim would be the most charitable thing to say.

Huh. I do have Tarim and I'd never build a Paladin deck of any kind (except Odd) without him. He's just THAT GOOD (and the continuing stigma of shame for me, since I declared before Un'Goro that he wouldn't be useful; mostly because Paladin had no way to get large numbers of Dudes on the board and keep them there. Hello, Lost in the Jungle and Vinecleaver!) I don't have a Meat Wagon, though. So I could basically still build this entire deck ignoring Rumble, with the exception of one Time Out. Hm.

Time Out! is really good. I needed a turn to set some stuff up and get my opponent to hit my board, which they dutifully did. I was thinking I wouldn't know when to use it best; but it's not been hard to work out, sometimes they have a lot of stuff and you don't have so much stuff. and it's like a free turn-and-a-half to get Taunts down, gain some life, &c.

Shrink Ray has been good too. With Eggs it's like a strictly better Equality. I

I would play Tarim if I had it. The synergy with ... everything ... is awesome. 3/3 Eggs? YES PLZ PLus sometimes it's really in my interest to have my Cubes die and I can't kill them fast enough at 4/6.

I would play Kangor too if I had it. That card is solid and likely better than a Hydrologist. Kangor + Lay On Hands late game? That would be an okay turn.