Front Page

Content

Authors

Game Index

Forums

Site Tools

Submissions

About

O
oliverkinne
September 29, 2023
302 0

Bagh Chal Review

Board Game Reviews
AL
Andi Lennon
September 28, 2023
518 0
T
thegiantbrain
September 27, 2023
344 0
O
oliverkinne
September 26, 2023
418 0
O
oliverkinne
September 25, 2023
625 0

Castle Panic Review

Board Game Reviews
S
Sagrilarus
September 22, 2023
538 0
T
thegiantbrain
July 13, 2023
2058 0
T
thegiantbrain
July 06, 2023
1267 0
T
thegiantbrain
June 29, 2023
1189 0

Cult of the Old - Citadels

Podcasts & Videos
G
GrantLyon
June 26, 2023
1692 0
T
thegiantbrain
June 22, 2023
1091 0

Cult of the Old - Brass

Podcasts & Videos
GS
Gary Sax
June 21, 2023
6276 0
Hot
O
oliverkinne
June 20, 2023
952 0
O
oliverkinne
June 13, 2023
1344 0
×
Bugs: Recent Topics Paging, Uploading Images & Preview (11 Dec 2020)

Recent Topics paging, uploading images and preview bugs require a patch which has not yet been released.

Flashback Friday - Eclipse - Love It or Hate It? Do You Still Play It?

More
03 Mar 2020 09:37 #307637 by n815e
So, while Eclipse encourages combat, March basically requires you to? Is it a competition for resources?

Is combat punishing to the point of not wanting to risk it if you lose everything?

March seems like an interesting game to me and I have watched it for a while.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
03 Mar 2020 10:21 - 03 Mar 2020 10:21 #307639 by Erik Twice
I think the difference mostly comes down to balance. In Eclipse, combat is a minor source of points. You win at Eclipse through better economic development. When I've played the game, fighting stops the moment you can't get any more VP chits from it.

In March of the Ants, combat is also a minor source of points. However, March of the Ants is won by holding hexes. Perhaps it's hexes that naturally give VPs, perhaps it's because the "Colony goals" you played require you too. Either way, if you are not holding certain hexes you either don't win or allow others to get a bunch of points.

Since the game is deterministic and tight on both points and actions, skirmishes are always worthwhile. You cannot snowball to victory and you never have enough resource to shrug off an attack.

Still, I don't think combat is punishing in March of the Ants unless you dump it all in one hex and try to win "big battles". Being deterministic works both ways: It makes it easier to attack, but also easier to run when attacked. In fact, the "March" action has a "one one ant" reaction attached, so players may flee if things get too loopsided.
Last edit: 03 Mar 2020 10:21 by Erik Twice.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Cambyses

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
03 Mar 2020 11:45 #307640 by charlest
That's interesting because my games of Eclipse have a ton of fighting at the end, whether each player's VP chits are full or not.

For one, you could always pull a better number. I've pulled enough late game 3s and 4s to make this a thing.

But more importantly, taking land from another player is the most significant way to influence results. The mad dash for territory gain is a huge delta if you target a player in the lead.

I'd say normal scores in Eclipse for a winner are 30-40. With 10-12ish points coming from Combat and 10-20 coming from territory. Combat and aggression is usually the deciding factor in the 30 or so games of it I've played.

I've only seen someone turtle and win maybe 2 or 3 times. I've seen people try it but we got used to exploring and forming connections with neighbors early in the game not long into our learning curve. When I have seen someone isolate themselves with closed connections I've seen someone still wreck them using wormhole generator.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Msample, Erik Twice

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: Gary Sax
Time to create page: 0.270 seconds