- Posts: 4363
- Thank you received: 5682
Bugs: Recent Topics Paging, Uploading Images & Preview (11 Dec 2020)
Recent Topics paging, uploading images and preview bugs require a patch which has not yet been released.
What disgustingly cute animals are you ROOTing?
- Jackwraith
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Ninja
- Maim! Kill! Burn!
The list of complaints on the balance front over on BGG is long but, amusingly, about even between the four base factions. In other words, everyone thinks at least one of them is unbalanced, so everyone is pretty much wrong. I've tossed in my opinion that the Vagabond is mildly out of whack because he can just play his own game and ignore everyone else. As long as he has quests to pursue and complete, he'll win regardless of what anyone else does and can feed off the crafting tendencies of anyone else ("You didn't need that item, did you? Here. Have a maybe useful card.") But I'm open to being corrected.
The one conclusion that everyone seems to have drifted to is that the Lizards suck. I haven't had the chance to play with them, so I have no opinion. I am mildly confused about one thing regarding the Riverfolk, though. When it says "Move all warriors on your board to your Funds box", that includes Commitments, right? So Committing warriors is basically just using them as placeholders until next turn when you sweep them back into Funds, right? That means that if you don't spend them, you can essentially hold opposing warriors for quite a number of turns. That would mean that the Woodland Alliance will basically never want to do business with you, since they can't really spare warriors that would otherwise become officers or actually see use on the map. I really feel like I'm missing something with the Riverfolk but, again, just like with the Lizards, I haven't had a chance to play with them so I probably am.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
We've found the WA strongest, with Birds and Vagabond and Riverfolk next, followed by the Cats and Lizards.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Disgustipater
- Offline
- D8
- Dapper Deep One
- Posts: 2178
- Thank you received: 1674
Vagabond also got toned down a bit.
Changes can be found here .
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
My tier list goes like this:
Tier 1: Alliance, Vagabond
Tier 2: Eyrie
Tier 3: Riverfolk
Tier 3.5: Cult
Tier 4: Marquis
The Alliance is effectively the game's timer. You need to be able to outpace them, which means winning before they explode into VPs. A good alliance player, moreso than any other faction in Root, can function regardless of board state. Smart placement of sympathy to leech tons of cards goes an incredibly long way and fighting them is a horrible slog. Still has to be done, and a WA casualty is worth a lot more than most due to their low unit count, but painful. The changes to their VP track aren't going to stop them from being able to burst, they'll just do it slightly slower.
Vagabond isn't busted, just much easier to play well than the other factions. You play your game, pick up your items, do your quests, game over. What people seem to forget is how reliant the Vagabond is on other people making them items. Early on crafting is often done with little thought because points are good, only to have the items they made give the Vagabond the means to ruin them a few turns later. It becomes much more even when you keep the Vagabond poor, only making items when it benefits you more or you come to a deal. A loaded Vagabond is a winning Vagabond.
Eyrie is the strongest "normal" faction, which is to say they play the closest to a traditional dudes-on-a-map game. Their weakness is point generation. This is meant to be supplemented by being the best at destroying other people's buildings, which they excel at. The correct way to play them is to drop 2 cards as often as possible, haul ass, be a wrecking ball, then go into turmoil in your last step when you intend to. It's very fun once you get a feel for it.
I put the Riverfolk here because they can swing wildly depending on how trade-happy people are. They function rich or poor but the playstyle is dramatically different. Rich otters are looking to play defensive, keep their posts safe, and score dividends by not burning through their coins. Poor otters are basically playing the Eyrie, only they get to move freely and along the river. Where they struggle is getting enough units out to punch through stronger fighters. Because they're the most reliant on negotiation they're the hardest to get a consistent rating on. Loads of fun though.
The Lizard Cult really isn't bad. They were designed to be wonky and slow because Cole likes playing the underdog faction, but they're super dangerous and have a pretty easy time taking over areas thanks to being able to show up anywhere with ease. Where they struggle, and why they're slow, is that they can't really score points until about mid-game on. This means they're directly competing with the Alliance and the Alliance is better at it. They're getting a laundry list of buffs, most notably being able to flip to hated outcast WAY more easily, so I'm confident they'll bridge the gap pretty easily going forward.
Now we dig into some painful stuff. The Marquis isn't particularly good at anything. They're really easy to play but also easy to kneecap, and once you do so they don't really have any way to regain momentum. Their starting position inevitably puts them on the back foot and forces them to play defensive, and defending is just bad in Root. I'm VERY excited to play them with the new field hospital rules. Being able to save 3 cats at a time is a big damn deal and makes them way more resilient. Unlike the Lizard buffs though, I'm hesitant to say that it'll bring them up to parity.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Jackwraith
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Ninja
- Maim! Kill! Burn!
- Posts: 4363
- Thank you received: 5682
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
therewillbe.games/forum/15-games-catchal...root?start=60#285665
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Gary Sax wrote: I should look into printing some of the board changes. I doubt leder is going to do an update sticker kit but I haven't looked.
They said they're going to reprint the boards with the upcoming expansion. Possibly a sticker set, but not sure.
Jackwraith wrote: Cool. Am I right about the Riverfolk Funds/Commitments thing? When you commit funds, you just sweep them back into the Funds box on the following turn, right? So if someone paid me 3 warriors for a card they wanted, I could effectively keep those warriors for most of the game by committing them and not spending them for trade posts, right?
Yeah, you don't lose commitments. You can lose them when your posts are destroyed IIRC, so you need to be careful if you're going to float a bunch of funds. There are a couple ways to keep warriors in limbo. To touch on what you mentioned earlier, a smart WA player will almost never hand you their precious pieces. They don't have a hard time getting cards anyway.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Jackwraith
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Ninja
- Maim! Kill! Burn!
- Posts: 4363
- Thank you received: 5682
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Jackwraith
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Ninja
- Maim! Kill! Burn!
- Posts: 4363
- Thank you received: 5682
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- hotseatgames
- Offline
- D12
- Posts: 7160
- Thank you received: 6265
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- hotseatgames
- Offline
- D12
- Posts: 7160
- Thank you received: 6265
Experienced players.... does the Eyrie ever stand a chance if they go into Turmoil even once? Their faction seems very fragile in that regard.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.