Bugs: Recent Topics Paging, Uploading Images & Preview (11 Dec 2020)
Recent Topics paging, uploading images and preview bugs require a patch which has not yet been released.
Hobbit 3 Talk
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Black Barney
-
- Offline
- D20
-
- 10k Club
- Posts: 10045
- Thank you received: 3553
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Posts: 1728
- Thank you received: 771
I saw this on NYE. I'd enjoyed the last two enough. This was probably my least favourite of the series, i don't hate it, but found myself checking the time quite often despite it not being that long. I don't really object the changes in plot or feel betrayed or anything, i just didn't find it as entertaining as i hoped. I spent a remarkably long time wondering whether they were going to cut Bjorn, who for some weird reason is one of my childhood memories of reading the book.
things i liked; Billy Connolly, some of the fight choreography, dwarfs chearing the arrival of more dwarfs, Richard Armitage (forget his dorf name) rejecting negotiations, Martin Freeman, the first 20mins or so of battle stuff (then i got a bit tired)
things that could have been better;
The ecstasy of gold with Richard Armitage could have been given a bit more screen. They could have gone full Sierra Madre with him. In general i felt there was an excelent opportunity to make a really big deal out of the greed of various characters. it was in there but didn't really impact me.
Bilbo, he is the most interesting character, i thought he could have been used a bit more. Too much Legolas's face (by far the most uninteresting character in the 6 films), they could have cut him to a cameo and given me a lot more Martin Freeman.
Build up for the scene where the big guns show up to save Gandalf was completely missing. I didn't mind the inclusion of this part of the story, it just sort of felt dropped in really jarringly. If you were not already very familiar with the Lotr it would be even weirder i guess, which i strange for a scene explicitly to point toward the later story.
Also, why the Dune worms? SHI HALUD!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Black Barney
-
- Offline
- D20
-
- 10k Club
- Posts: 10045
- Thank you received: 3553
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
ldsdbomber wrote: definitely, but *after* the fact, it's naive to think that somehow he "failed", since the number of zeroes now padding the bank accounts of the people in charge of it say otherwise. I'm sure Jackson will get over it once he's sat in his trunks in the cayman islands getting blown by hookers. It certainly makes me feel better every time i lose an argument here. Though its a lot colder here and I pay the missus a lot less
I assume that you are a huge fan of the Twilight movie franchise. Combined worldwide box office for those movies is close to one billion dollars.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Shellhead wrote:
I assume that you are a huge fan of the Twilight movie franchise. Combined worldwide box office for those movies is close to one billion dollars.
I have always fucking detested this idiotic argument. "Because this one terrible thing made a bunch of money, you may no longer use monetary returns as any sort of argument of quality or popularity, ever."
It's the exact same thing when someone mentions a game is selling well so it's probably good, and someone replies, "Hu hu, Monopoly." Brilliant.
Actually, you know, I take that back about the "terrible thing"--Twilight was not aimed at thirtysomething male geeks. I know it chaps the ass of male geeks around the world when a thing is not aimed at them and yet it does well, but y'know, that's how it is. At any rate, the Twilight series was aimed at teenage girls, they loved it, and it was rewarded with their cash.
Anyway. Back to lurking.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Oh hang on, wrong fucking annoying dwarf thread, sorry
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
I can accept that GoT is well done, I just think it pales in comparison to the Hobbit and that is a valid and, you'll have to trust me on this part, well thought out opinion. Maybe you guys can muster up enough respect for our opinions to accept that maybe you just don't like them and that doesn't change the fact that they're well done?
Maybe?
Money doesn't need to come into it you know.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Shellhead wrote:
ldsdbomber wrote: definitely, but *after* the fact, it's naive to think that somehow he "failed", since the number of zeroes now padding the bank accounts of the people in charge of it say otherwise. I'm sure Jackson will get over it once he's sat in his trunks in the cayman islands getting blown by hookers. It certainly makes me feel better every time i lose an argument here. Though its a lot colder here and I pay the missus a lot less
I assume that you are a huge fan of the Twilight movie franchise. Combined worldwide box office for those movies is close to one billion dollars.
I dunno, Ive not watched them and dont plan to, but if I had made them I'm sure I'd not be worrying too much about whether it was shit or not as I sipped White Russians out of the navels of 1970s Lynda Carter lookalikes on my luxury yacht moored out by the Cayman Islands. And I certainly wouldn't be logging in to check up on the opinions of nerds on internet forums as my viagra-cocaine tab slowly dissolved in my ringpiece just to keep me fizzing for the champagne lunch I'd be having shortly.
possible conversation. lets say from "Amber":
"darling, it seems a frightful amount of pre pubescent 40 year olds are not well impressed with your erstwhile vampire-werewolf teen love epic"
probable reply:
"gfdjghehgrherogoe" (sound of my face buried under some impossibly round phat ass covered in limoncello)
reply never happening:
"drats, I knew we should have spent more time with those storyboards, quick, fire up the jet lets get the editing team back in the office for a corrected directors cut on the blu ray for christmas"
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Really whole battle going on, we see the dwarf army arrive. Only the cousin guy is riding an animal and that animal is a pig. No goats. But when our heroes need to get to the mountain top to fight the super-orc, there are goats just hanging out on the battle field.
I don't know why this bothers me, but it really does.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
edulis wrote: I don't know why this bothers me, but it really does.
Would you say it really gets your goat?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Posts: 642
- Thank you received: 205
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
edulis wrote: Finally got around to seeing this... It was okay, but when did Dwarfs gain the ability to cast summon War Goat.
My kids and I just laughed and laughed and laughed at that scene. The movie establishes that Thandruil is riding a gigantic war-moose. Okay, fine. And Dain Ironfoot has a war-pig. Sure.
But who left those four war-goats parked there?? Just hilarious.
When you notice stupid continuity errors like that, then you know the movie has not succeeded in pulling you into its world.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Black Barney
-
- Offline
- D20
-
- 10k Club
- Posts: 10045
- Thank you received: 3553
You can just see him getting his arsenal ready and thinking to himself, "time to bust out the big guns"
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.