X-Files: Conspiracy Theory Board Game Review

W Updated
0.0 (0)
1537   2
X-Files: Conspiracy Theory Review

Game Information

There Will Be Games

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

"Welcome to whose conspiracy is it, anyway? Where everything is made up and the points don't matter"

I love games that are about moments. Like playing King of Tokyo and having someone sitting outside of Tokyo roll six paw/attack icons to crush a player on the brink of winning. Or aceing that sniper shot in Seal Team Flix, earning high fives from everyone around the table. And X-Files: Conspiracy Theory, played with the right group, can provide those moments, despite having flaws in almost every aspect of the game.

The gameplay is simple: Players take turns as Agent Mulder. You draw a conspiracy card that sets the stage, such as "12 Tigers go missing from 12 Different Zoos." The other players then each add one evidence card to the mix, such as "The Republican Party" "12 empty body bags" or "Alien Abduction." The Player who is Mulder then has 30 seconds to think up a story that will use all the pieces of evidence to create a theory that explains the conspiracy. Once Mulder is finished relaying the story, the other players then judge the tale with a simultaneous reveal of thumbs up or thumbs down.

The "game" is really more of an improv session. The evidence cards read like a keyword search of every episode of the X-Files. The problem is some of these pieces of evidence go deep into X-files lore. It's been years since I have watched X-files and I had plenty of "I have no idea what/who that is" moments. Having a cell phone out on the game table is verboten enough, much less NEEDING one out to google obscure references while the game stalls. It is especially biting because the people improvising this tale will inevitably feel ridiculous repeatedly requesting clarification of what the hell they are supposed to be talking about. That is to say nothing of the people listening to the tale and voting. Because they completely lack any inclination to actually bother halting the game for a clarification. When the game isn't delving deep into X-File lore, it also throws in some strange evidence cards, like including "Alex Jones." It's a odd mixture of X-Files canon related cards and non-related cards. Maybe they were just trying to really go with the Everything is Connected theme but, come on, if you are going to put Alex Jones in at least throw in a "Gay Frogs" card.

The voting mechanism is also suspect. You don't vote on if you think the created story was believable or good or fascinating. You vote on how you think everyone else will vote. What is this, High School Clique: Mean Girls edition? "I don't want to vote what I think; I just want to go along with the crowd." More importantly, this scoring system leads to the worst sort of...well...not exactly kingmaking but king-preventing. The Mulder player scores a point if he receives more thumbs up than thumbs down. The other players receive a point if they vote with the majority of other players. If the player currently in the points lead is playing Mulder, just how many thumbs up votes do you think he's going to get? When the action you have just taken can literally have zero impact on if you score a point or not, that is a disconnect of the worst kind. They even suggest that players who don't want to have to weave a story skip their Mulder turn and still vote...but they can't win. Wow, now the points REALLY don't matter.

Also, the "30 seconds" to free-form a conspiracy theory in your mind might work if you are Ryan Styles or the ghost of Robin Williams, but normal humans are going to need a bit more time. Sure, putting "The player has a few minutes to compose a theory" in the rulebook might tip off everyone off that they are going to have to wait a bit for the fun to begin, but it would certainly be more realistic.

Instructions for a variant mode called "Jose Chung's Conspiracy Theory" are included. This calls for all the players to recount a story linking two evidence cards, telling what they witnessed. After everyone has gone, it is up to the Jose Chung character to weave all of these wild stories into a single narrative to explain a Conspiracy. The Witnesses then vote on if they feel they were properly represented in the story. While this doesn't circumvent the issues with the evidence cards, it does at least focus the voting on the actual story instead of simple trying to score points.

It may be called X-files but no one is playing Scully here. There is no voice of reason or alternative narrative provided by another player. In the end, improvising a story with random words would accomplish the same thing as this title does. Only then you wouldn't have to deal with the social dysfunction of the scoring system and googling obscure character references. This game has a laundry list of flaws but it also has provided some laugh-so-hard-you-cry moments and it gets its fair share of "Let's play that conspiracy game" requests on game night. It provides some fun, to be sure, and to that end it is a success despite its supremely questionable quality as a design.

A review copy of this release was provided by the publisher. Therewillbe.games would like to thank them for their support.

X-Files: Conspiracy Theory Review Wade MonnigSubscrive to Wade Monnig Follow Wade Monnig Message Wade Monnig


Board Game Reviewer

In west Saint Louis born and raised
Playing video games is where I spent most of my days
Strafing, Dashing, Adventuring and Looting
Writing reviews between all the Shooting
When a couple of guys reminded me what was so good
About playing games with cardboard and Wood,
Collecting Victory Points and those Miniatures with Flair
It’s not as easy as you think to rhyme with Bel Air.

Wade is the former editor in chief for Silicon Magazine and former senior editor for Gamearefun.com. He currently enjoys his games in the non-video variety, where the odds of a 14 year old questioning the legitimacy of your bloodline is drastically reduced.

“I’ll stop playing as Black when they invent a darker color.”

Articles by Wade

Editor review

1 reviews

(Updated: September 13, 2018)
Board Game Reviews 


X-Files: Conspiracy Theory

User reviews

There are no user reviews for this listing.
Already have an account? or Create an account
Log in to comment

hotseatgames's Avatar
hotseatgames replied the topic: #282894 09 Oct 2018 11:39
I think it's cool that it plays to hardcore X-Files fans. I like to see attention to detail.
WadeMonnig's Avatar
WadeMonnig replied the topic: #282918 09 Oct 2018 18:58

hotseatgames wrote: I think it's cool that it plays to hardcore X-Files fans. I like to see attention to detail.

Unfortunately, it came off as more of a list of characters who appeared in the show instead of attention to detail. Like a keyword list from a Wikipedia page. Maybe it's just the nature of the game, since It needs persons, places, and things.
engineer Al's Avatar
engineer Al replied the topic: #282965 10 Oct 2018 21:22
I had fun playing this at a Con recently. Definitely had one of those "moments" that will keep me smiling inside for a long while.
WadeMonnig's Avatar
WadeMonnig replied the topic: #282972 11 Oct 2018 02:48

engineer Al wrote: I had fun playing this at a Con recently. Definitely had one of those "moments" that will keep me smiling inside for a long while.

It didn't involve the cards "Drinking establishment" "board game convention" and "punching a Nazi", did it?
engineer Al's Avatar
engineer Al replied the topic: #282991 11 Oct 2018 18:47

WadeMonnig wrote:

engineer Al wrote: I had fun playing this at a Con recently. Definitely had one of those "moments" that will keep me smiling inside for a long while.

It didn't involve the cards "Drinking establishment" "board game convention" and "punching a Nazi", did it?

No. Not all three.