- Posts: 12742
- Thank you received: 8425
×
Bugs: Recent Topics Paging, Uploading Images & Preview (11 Dec 2020)
Recent Topics paging, uploading images and preview bugs require a patch which has not yet been released.
×
For those who like to push chits.
Fast Action Battles (FAB) wargame series
Less
More
04 May 2021 10:35 #322841
by Gary Sax
Replied by Gary Sax on topic Fast Action Battles (FAB) wargame series
BACK FROM THE DEAD.
I got out my copy of Golan 73 last night. Still easily my favorite operational warfare series, I'm just lucky there are *just* enough people at GMT who like the series to keep getting releases. This game is *so* good at conflict outside of the carefully constructed world war 2 era, I really hope that more designers use it for later 20th century conflict. I think it would be a great fit for smaller games, I could imagine a Iran-Iraq war situation pre-stalemate, India-Pakistan, etc.
I have so many thoughts about the way this game models conflict and how good it is, and how different than the operational games I've played at this scale it is---looks like I dumped a big one in a long post like 5 years ago above.
Anyway, FAB: Crusader, which I preordered just to keep FAB going, is up for art and such right now I believe at GMT after many years languishing on P500---I don't blame them, it's just over that 500 number and not much more. They just put a new one up on a classic Russian front tank battle I will back as well, though again I can't say I'm overly enthused about it. East front just isn't my favorite.
I got out my copy of Golan 73 last night. Still easily my favorite operational warfare series, I'm just lucky there are *just* enough people at GMT who like the series to keep getting releases. This game is *so* good at conflict outside of the carefully constructed world war 2 era, I really hope that more designers use it for later 20th century conflict. I think it would be a great fit for smaller games, I could imagine a Iran-Iraq war situation pre-stalemate, India-Pakistan, etc.
I have so many thoughts about the way this game models conflict and how good it is, and how different than the operational games I've played at this scale it is---looks like I dumped a big one in a long post like 5 years ago above.
Anyway, FAB: Crusader, which I preordered just to keep FAB going, is up for art and such right now I believe at GMT after many years languishing on P500---I don't blame them, it's just over that 500 number and not much more. They just put a new one up on a classic Russian front tank battle I will back as well, though again I can't say I'm overly enthused about it. East front just isn't my favorite.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
04 May 2021 11:03 #322842
by Msample
Replied by Msample on topic Fast Action Battles (FAB) wargame series
I haven't played FAB beyond the initial Bulge game. It got a lot of initial grief because it wasn't "fast enough". I disagree. the game is faster than most one map Bulge games. The Asset Chit system is a clever way to supplement the block system with chrome like elements with a minimal amount of overhead. The rule layout was a bit clunky; I think they went to a series/game specific approach in later titles.
I didn't buy SICILY or GOLAN due to lack of interest in the subject matter, but may take a look at Crusader.
I didn't buy SICILY or GOLAN due to lack of interest in the subject matter, but may take a look at Crusader.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Gary Sax
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Less
More
- Posts: 12742
- Thank you received: 8425
04 May 2021 11:06 - 04 May 2021 11:08 #322843
by Gary Sax
Replied by Gary Sax on topic Fast Action Battles (FAB) wargame series
Yeah, Sicily works and is fun but I don't think it shows the system at its best. Golan does, though setting interest is personal so I get it. Sounds like you'll be excited for FAB: Dubno thematically.
I sympathize with people criticizing the "fast" part because they're thinking fast like CC Ancients or something. But this game *is* very fast from the perspective of the operational game space it's working in...
I sympathize with people criticizing the "fast" part because they're thinking fast like CC Ancients or something. But this game *is* very fast from the perspective of the operational game space it's working in...
Last edit: 04 May 2021 11:08 by Gary Sax.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Msample
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
04 May 2021 11:26 #322845
by n815e
Replied by n815e on topic Fast Action Battles (FAB) wargame series
I liked Bulge and it’s asset system. I think Rick Young has good ideas (his special actions in Europe Engulfed was good, too).
Unfortunately, I don’t have friends who will play these with me.
Unfortunately, I don’t have friends who will play these with me.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Gary Sax
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Less
More
- Posts: 12742
- Thank you received: 8425
04 May 2021 12:26 #322847
by Gary Sax
Replied by Gary Sax on topic Fast Action Battles (FAB) wargame series
Same, but I've never been someone to turn down a Toad. I should get some vassal going with it sometime.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Less
More
- Posts: 12742
- Thank you received: 8425
05 May 2021 14:47 #322885
by Gary Sax
Ungh, this game is so good. Absolutely agonizing strategic and decision centered around air support assets and special actions that backfired on the Syrians.
Replied by Gary Sax on topic Fast Action Battles (FAB) wargame series
Ungh, this game is so good. Absolutely agonizing strategic and decision centered around air support assets and special actions that backfired on the Syrians.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Msample
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: Gary Sax
Time to create page: 0.321 seconds