Front Page

Content

Authors

Game Index

Forums

Site Tools

Submissions

About

O
oliverkinne
January 30, 2023
173 0

Soulaween Review

Board Game Reviews
O
oliverkinne
January 27, 2023
646 0
O
oliverkinne
January 26, 2023
293 0

Aves Board Game Review

Board Game Reviews
S
Sagrilarus
January 25, 2023
325 0
O
oliverkinne
January 24, 2023
354 0
W
We-reNotWizards
January 24, 2023
355 0
T
thegiantbrain
January 23, 2023
455 0

Hardback Board Game Review

Board Game Reviews
S
Sagrilarus
January 20, 2023
337 0
O
oliverkinne
January 20, 2023
1010 0

Outpost 18 Review

Board Game Reviews
O
oliverkinne
January 05, 2023
894 0

Villagers Board Game Review

Board Game Reviews
T
thegiantbrain
January 05, 2023
803 0
O
oliverkinne
January 03, 2023
1362 0
T
thegiantbrain
December 29, 2022
791 0
S
Sagrilarus
December 28, 2022
542 0
O
oliverkinne
December 28, 2022
672 0
W
We-reNotWizards
December 28, 2022
674 0
×
Bugs: Recent Topics Paging, Uploading Images & Preview (11 Dec 2020)

Recent Topics paging, uploading images and preview bugs require a patch which has not yet been released.

Gale Force 9 Announces Line of Star Trek Games

More
02 Aug 2015 22:16 #207767 by ubarose

Gale Force 9, a Battlefront Group Company, announced that it will launch a new series of Star Trek games in the Summer 2016.

Read more...

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
02 Aug 2015 22:23 #207768 by Gary Sax
That's great news... all in the new universe, I assume...

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
02 Aug 2015 22:25 #207769 by Da Bid Dabid
I would do bad things for a GF 9 TNG game...

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
02 Aug 2015 23:05 #207770 by Michael Barnes
Hell yeah! I'll take all of that you're sellin'!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
03 Aug 2015 01:58 #207776 by engineer Al
Haminna, hamina, hamina. . .

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
03 Aug 2015 02:07 #207777 by SuperflyPete
Can't wait to tie on a cheap London accent and say, "My dear friend Romulus...it appears your gladiators have tasted tainted wine...."

Fuck yeah

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
03 Aug 2015 07:32 #207780 by Applejack
Is "Star Trek" still a draw for people? I'm as much a fan as anybody, but I didn't really care for the J. J. Abrams reboot, and there hasn't been a TV series since "Enterprise". How much more is there to explore in the "Star Trek" universe? It used to be a very relevant show, but it seems "Star Trek" has become just another action sci-fi movie franchise.
The following user(s) said Thank You: ChristopherMD, OldHippy

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
03 Aug 2015 17:09 #207871 by Josh Look
WOOOOOO-HOOOOOO!!!!!!! This is terrific news!

I would actually wager that this is in the old universe.

Yes, Star Trek is still relevant. Love the old stuff, love the new stuff. Wouldn't have gotten into the old stuff if the new stuff wasn't so damned awesome. I prefer TOS now, but the reboot did its job, young people care about Star Trek.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
03 Aug 2015 17:18 #207874 by Ken B.
GF9 is "on fuckin' fire" (as they say in the industry) as of late. I'm definitely interested in their take on the Star Trek Universe.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
03 Aug 2015 17:26 #207877 by Hex Sinister
I'm probably alone here but I would really love a ST game that just had generic star fleet dudes instead of well... you know. But it's not gonna happen, I get it. I think that would be way fuckin' better though.
The following user(s) said Thank You: ChristopherMD

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
03 Aug 2015 18:07 #207880 by jpat
Certainly GF9's licensed-property success earns them a look or two at anything Star Trek related, but I do agree with the undercurrent of Star Trek being basically culturally irrelevant at this point. After 2009's Star Trek, which I thought was refreshing, Into Darkness was basically just shitting the bed. It's been 16 years since the end of the last series that if not universally popular was not sharply polarizing or derided, and Star Trek has always been primarily a TV phenomenon despite middling success on film, in books, and in other media.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
04 Aug 2015 12:12 #207934 by southernman
Can someone please tell them that I have a son probably going to university in two years so all games and expansions need to be finished by then so he doesn't starve for the following three years !

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
04 Aug 2015 13:47 #207941 by Stonecutter
Cranky fanboy alert:

This needs to be TNG/DS9/VOY era or I have zero interest, or at least the WizKids-ified TOS/TNG combined thing which shouldn't work but somehow does.

Anything either entirely TOS or JJ Abrams related can die in a fire. TOS is campy and bad. Abrams era is a middling to bad sci fi universe with Trek trappings.

Next Generation/Deep Space 9/Voyager, Borg/Cardassians/Dominion war/Species 8472 is the good stuff that's actually interesting and why they ever left that universe behind is so beyond me. I could watch another dozen captains try to prevent a full out Klingon/Romulan war through diplomacy and espionage in a dozen ways and still be entertained, but I cannot deal with another Captain Kirk's Dick Goes Rogue and Gets Everyone in Trouble plot.

Amazon, Netflix, Crackle, Hulu, HBO, Showtime, PBS, FX, and AMC are all producing smart, original, risk taking content, people actually know who Dr. Who is, Star Wars is about to have it's second major revolution of the 21st century, BSG came back and was successful, and we can't get a sniff of a 24th century Trek series? What the hell? Why is this so hard.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Frohike

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
04 Aug 2015 14:29 #207943 by Shellhead

jpat wrote: Certainly GF9's licensed-property success earns them a look or two at anything Star Trek related, but I do agree with the undercurrent of Star Trek being basically culturally irrelevant at this point. After 2009's Star Trek, which I thought was refreshing, Into Darkness was basically just shitting the bed. It's been 16 years since the end of the last series that if not universally popular was not sharply polarizing or derided, and Star Trek has always been primarily a TV phenomenon despite middling success on film, in books, and in other media.


Into Darkness was bad for the exact same reason that Prometheus, World War Z (the movie), and the finale to Lost were all bad.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
04 Aug 2015 15:41 - 04 Aug 2015 16:02 #207946 by OldHippy
If they can make this an adventure game with very minimal combat I might be interested. I would like it to try and explore sci-fi theme's and allow for a fun story to develop that we truly get to interact with and try to 'solve' (for lack of a better word), kind of like the first three seasons of TOS (that and TNG are about the only Trek things I love). If they can do that... I'm in. If it's just another action game in space I'm not really interested because that is not what I love about Star Trek.
Last edit: 04 Aug 2015 16:02 by OldHippy.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: Gary Sax
Time to create page: 0.257 seconds