Front Page

Content

Authors

Game Index

Forums

Site Tools

Submissions

About

You May Also Like...

O
oliverkinne
December 14, 2023
Hot

Mycelia Board Game Review

Board Game Reviews
O
oliverkinne
December 07, 2023
Hot

River Wild Board Game Review

Board Game Reviews
O
oliverkinne
November 30, 2023
Hot
J
Jackwraith
November 29, 2023
Hot
O
oliverkinne
October 09, 2023
Hot
O
oliverkinne
October 06, 2023
Hot

Outback Crossing Review

Board Game Reviews
O
oliverkinne
October 05, 2023
O
oliverkinne
October 02, 2023
Hot

Forests of Pangaia Review

Board Game Reviews
O
oliverkinne
September 29, 2023
Hot

Bagh Chal Review

Board Game Reviews
AL
Andi Lennon
September 28, 2023
Hot
O
oliverkinne
September 25, 2023

Castle Panic Review

Board Game Reviews
GS
Gary Sax
June 21, 2023
Hot
O
oliverkinne
June 09, 2023
Hot
O
oliverkinne
June 02, 2023
Hot

Ahoy Board Game Review

Board Game Reviews
O
oliverkinne
May 26, 2023
Hot

Village Rails Review

Board Game Reviews
O
oliverkinne
May 19, 2023
Hot

The Spill Board Game Review

Board Game Reviews

RUNEWARS Review- Theatrical Cut

Hot
MB Updated December 02, 2019
 
0.0
 
0.0 (0)
39981 0
Runewars

Game Information

Game Name
There Will Be Games

RUNEWARS is, as many of us know by now, a pretty great game. I like it a lot, and after owning it for about a month I still want to play it week in and week out, which is a good sign. I think it's got legs, and I think over time its stature will grow with expansions.

But you know that feeling when you watch a movie and come to the realization that it was edited for length just so theater owners could squeeze out more showings per day? That's how RUNEWARS winds up feeling to me.

It's not that there's missing content- in fact, there's TONS of it, and more than should be wieldy in a modern board game. It's that the game feels like it was written to be shorter than it really is, as if FFG wanted to stick hard and fast to a 3-4 hour playtime as a marketing bullet point so concessions were made to accelerate the game. You may say "multiple paths to victory", but I say the game throws victory-generating Dragon Runes at you strictly as an accelerant. And it's almost better to avoid the military element altogether as it's a lot harder to fight your way into enemy territory to claim Dragon Runes than it is to topdeck one in a hero quest. The game may not even last long enough for you to make it halfway across the board.

Many have already cited the game as having that "over before it gets started" feeling that we've seen in WARRIOR KNIGHTS and a couple of other recent games, and it definitely can have that- I saw a game end on the third turn thanks to a couple of Dragon Thrones and some lucky draws. Sure, you can fix that by playing to however many Dragon Runes you want, but the fact remains that RUNEWARS is a big, epic-scale game that needs to be played all day, not something to squish into three hours so you can play a bunch of filler games before you go home. Simply stated, the game is edited for length.

Beyond that, I sincerely believe that there is no excuse for this game to have shipped as a 2-4 player game at a $100 MRSP. Practically no one in the world will be surprised when FFG releases an expansion that adds empires and components to expand the number of players. That makes fielding a five or six player game of RUNEWARS a $140-$150 proposition. You could almost buy a current generation game console for that, or three other board games of equal or better quality. And given that games like TI3 and STARCRAFT shipped with $80 price points and had- literally- twice as many components, it doesn't seem to balance out. I don't fault FFG for trying to turn a profit, but when what you're getting in a $100 box isn't on par with the rest of a product line in terms of player support and component density, something's not quite right.

But there again, this is a 45-60 minute per player game, and having 5-6 players out of the box means that you're breaking that 3-4 hour threshold. So the decision to not include full support feels like another editing choice to ensure that potential buyers aren't scared off by a 6 hour game...that really needs to be about 6 hours to capture the epic scope and range of it all.

But I'm just bitchin', RUNEWARS is still a good one and it's one that you should play.


Michael Barnes (He/Him)
Senior Board Game Reviews Editor

Sometime in the early 1980s, MichaelBarnes’ parents thought it would be a good idea to buy him a board game to keep him busy with some friends during one of those high-pressure, “free” timeshare vacations. It turned out to be a terrible idea, because the game was TSR’s Dungeon! - and the rest, as they say, is history. Michael has been involved with writing professionally about games since 2002, when he busked for store credit writing for Boulder Games’ newsletter. He has written for a number of international hobby gaming periodicals and popular Web sites. From 2004-2008, he was the co-owner of Atlanta Game Factory, a brick-and-mortar retail store. He is currently the co-founder of FortressAT.com and Nohighscores.com as well as the Editor-in-Chief of Miniature Market’s Review Corner feature. He is married with two childen and when he’s not playing some kind of game he enjoys stockpiling trivial information about music, comics and film.

Articles by Michael

Michael Barnes
Senior Board Game Reviews Editor

Articles by Michael

User reviews

There are no user reviews for this listing.
Already have an account? or Create an account
Log in to comment